User talk:Creativesoul8

Speedy deletion of Steel Wire Armoured (SWA) Cable

A tag has been placed on Steel Wire Armoured (SWA) Cable, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Millbrooky (talk) 14:52, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the speedy delete notice and responded on the article's talk page. --Millbrooky (talk) 17:46, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Take your time, I won't request another speedy delete on the article. If after a week the article still hasn't improved, however, I may take it to Articles for deletion where you would still have 5 days to make improvements and make your case to keep the article, but that's unlikely. The biggest problem with the article right now, in my opinion, is context. There's a lot of techno-babble on the page that I nor anyone would likely understand and may be unnecessary to describe the item. Of course, you probably know more about it than me. If you have any more questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. And lastly, happy editing! --Millbrooky (talk) 18:17, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joanne Black

The article Joanne Black has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

subject fails notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sadke4 (talk) 09:16, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]