User talk:Creatingabetterworld

This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of Maheshkumaryadav (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

2011 Indian protests against black money

What's up with all the redirects you've created to 2011 Indian protests against black money? Most of them seem very unnecessary. Kevin (talk) 19:27, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, 2011 Indian protests against black money

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, 2011 Indian protests against black money. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - [[:Corruption in India and 2011 Indian anti-corruption movement]]. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at [[:Corruption in India and 2011 Indian anti-corruption movement]] - you might like to discuss new information at [[Talk:Corruption in India and 2011 Indian anti-corruption movement|the article's talk page]].

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Qwyrxian (talk) 03:11, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the speedy deletion, but am still considering other processes; most likely a merge with 2011 Indian anti-corruption movement. Please see the talk page to discuss further]]. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:06, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Politics and online social networks

The article Politics and online social networks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced original research

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. De728631 (talk) 14:31, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Politics and judiciary

The article Politics and judiciary has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced original research

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. De728631 (talk) 14:34, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Politics and armed forces

The article Politics and armed forces has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced original research

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. De728631 (talk) 14:37, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent articles

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 14:37, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Politics and police, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. De728631 (talk) 14:42, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A real comment from a human

I know you've just gotten a whole bunch of automated messages, so I wanted to leave you a real message from a human. Please stop creating new articles temporarily. A large number of those articles do not meet our policies for notability, or are duplicates of articles already created, or would be better off as additions to currently existing articles. If you pause a minute, we can help you understand a little bit about how to create articles, and what sorts of policies are involved. Then, let's talk here about how to proceed. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:43, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On that note I'd like to add that I'm not a robot nor do I use automated editing tools. But for practical reasons I like to use the standardised templates I've left above ot inform you of certain issues with your articles. Apart from that, Qwyrxian is of course right. De728631 (talk) 14:55, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Maheshkumaryadav for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Sitush (talk) 14:46, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making articles

Your contributions show around 6 new stubs, and 30 or more redirects. Considering the nature of the stubs you are creating, and the fact that you are a suspected sockpuppet, please cease creating any new pages immediately. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:44, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mass fast against black money listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mass fast against black money. Since you had some involvement with the Mass fast against black money redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Kevin (talk) 17:11, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]