User talk:Crazydrclaw

Hi there!

Thanks for dropping me a line and for evidently realizing this isn't anything personal. The main concern for the article, like for so many deleted, is not demonstrating notability in its area, specifically under the criteria laid out by WP:CORP. If it can meet the criteria laid out there, it's certainly eligible for another go. - Vianello (Talk) 23:09, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing. I'll make a "userfied" version of the article. You'll be able to access it at User:Crazydrclaw/Eracks. Not right this very second, I mean, just in case you're logged in right now. But I'll do it right after I submit this message so it should be available in a minute or two. - Vianello (Talk) 23:04, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of ERacks

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is ERacks. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ERacks. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ERacks

A tag has been placed on ERacks, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 18:12, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]