User talk:Crazydoodle69

Administrators are bias.

Speedy deletion of Trashcan Comedies

A tag has been placed on Trashcan Comedies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 17:20, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Accounting4Taste, you will be blocked from editing. Oxymoron⁸³ 17:39, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow you guys sure are quick. Just sitting at you computers all day and doing nothing but bullying people that you don't even know

Your sense of entitlement regarding someone else's website is noted. --Calton | Talk 23:16, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Crazydoodle69

A tag has been placed on on your user page, User:Crazydoodle69, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages: user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam and the guidelines on user pages.

If you can indicate why the page is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page in question and leave a note on this page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Calton | Talk 23:16, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Calton

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Calton may be offensive or unwelcome. If you are the user, please log in under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. --Calton | Talk 14:48, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's the same thing that happened to me. YOU came in and deleted my profile. So YOU vandalized MY page. I thought personal profiles were where you can tell people who you are. But mine was deleted for doing so. Crazydoodle69 2:01, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Nope. You were trying to use someone else's web resources to flog your non-notable program. Which is, you know, not allowed and ought to be common sense to not do generally.--Calton | Talk 14:27, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to 1990, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:18, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contribution to Cannibal Corpse, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the sandbox to get started. Thank you. Quaeler (talk) 16:22, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to User talk:Crazydoodle69, you will be blocked from editing. Quaeler (talk) 14:25, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate speedy requests

Please stop making speedy deletion requests such as this and this. They are invalid and inappropriate, and disruptive behavior meant to illustrate a point is not acceptable. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 15:31, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated vandalism after multiple warnings. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

DGG (talk) 15:32, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You vandalize a bunch of stuff, give yourself barnstars (which don't even count) and then you blame other users? You say you, "hate Wikipedians that abuse their power and push people like me around like the afformentioned Calton," but that doesn't even make sense. How did this Calton user push you around? Look to me like he just warned you for vandalizing things. Also how do Wikipedians, "abuse their power"? And you claim you're being pushed around which is utterly ridiculous. If you don't like it, do something about it. It seems to me you're acting like a victim and want people to feel sorry for you when all you do is go around and vandalize crap. You are the one abusing your power! By putting a speedy deletion template on Cannibal Corpse for a "lack of interesting content" is total abuse. First off, the Cannibal Corpse page is a fine article. And if you don't like the article that doesn't mean you can do shit like that. Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 20:17, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Crazydoodle69, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Removal of warnings from your talk page violates Wikipedia policy. Please do not continue to delete them. Thanks, GaryColemanFan (talk) 23:27, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. I have removed the Original Barnstar from your user page, as you "awarded" it to yourself simply to attack another editor. Please do not make such attacks in the future. GaryColemanFan (talk) 23:27, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Great Teys

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Great Teys, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. tomasz. 18:00, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Several images that you uploaded, Image:David Lee Roth.jpg, Image:Van Halen 2008.jpg, and Image:Alex Van Halen.jpg, have been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because they are suspected copyright violations. Please look there if you know that the images are legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the images to find their entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on their pages if you are interested in their not being deleted. Thank you. --Onorem ♠Dil 18:55, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You Guys Are Morons

I didn't upload these pictures. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crazydoodle69 (talk • contribs)

No personal attacks please.

The upload history said you did. I'm guessing it wasn't mistaken. How about Image:Pat Carney.jpeg? Did you upload that one? How did you come to be the copyright holder for that image? --Onorem ♠Dil 17:39, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Stupidity. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. GaryColemanFan (talk) 05:53, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Pat Carney.jpeg

A tag has been placed on Image:Pat Carney.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Pat Carney.jpeg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onorem ♠Dil 17:41, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:ME!inblue.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:ME!inblue.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:58, 4 April 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Slon02 (talk) 03:58, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:The Great Teys Cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:The Great Teys Cover.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:49, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Me As The Flash.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Me As The Flash.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:45, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Me With Hitler.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Me With Hitler.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:25, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Me In Profile.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Me In Profile.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:45, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:JaredV.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:JaredV.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:54, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:JackW.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:JackW.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:27, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:ME!inblue.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ME!inblue.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. XXN, 16:59, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:CCHSISTEP.PNG

The file File:CCHSISTEP.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Columbiacityhslogo.gif

The file File:Columbiacityhslogo.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]