User talk:Crazyaboutlost

Article changes

Hello. You seem to be involved in making a lot of changes to many articles, with the edit summary of "correcting". Please stop doing this - if you are going to change information, you need reliable sources to back up your claim. Also, the correct English phrase is "born to parents", not "born from parents", as you keep insisting, such as here. Please stop your edit warring; any further disruption may result in a block. Tan | 39 16:30, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

3 reverts

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. (talk) Opinoso (talk) 21:34, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for violating the three-revert rule at Carmen Miranda. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes and seek dispute resolution if agreement cannot be reached rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe that this block is in error, you may request that it be reviewed by placing {{unblock|reason here}} on this page, which you will be able to edit during the block. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 04:41, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Crazyaboutlost (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I only replaced information that was removed with no reason. Carmen Miranda is portuguese. There's no why to remove it. In Brazil, some people try to deny that she was portuguese, and try to make her brazilian...

Decline reason:

3RR was clearly violated. Next time, engaged in discussion rather than reverting and edit warring. — Metros (talk) 17:36, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked again

For exactly the same thing. WP:3RR violation on Carmen Miranda, only a day or two after the expiration of a previous block for the same thing on the same article. This time blocked for a week. --barneca (talk) 21:15, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was about to block you myself. Gwen Gale (talk) 21:20, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Crazyaboutlost. Thank you. Opinoso (talk) 02:57, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please people, feel free to run a checkuser. I'm pretty sure I have more interesting things to do...Crazyaboutlost (talk) 16:43, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Czech Brazilians

Hi Crazyaboutlost. I totally agree with you concerning the exclusion of the photos in the article about Czech Brazilians, and I expressed my point of view in the discussion page. It seems that some members over here always trying to hide the European influence in the composition of the Southern Brazilian culture and population. - Hansch (talk) 06:15, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]