Jump to content

User talk:CrazyInsaneAnimeFanGirl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, CrazyInsaneAnimeFanGirl, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

Thanks for your contributions. Providing a little more detail on the seiyuus you're creating articles for would be nice - if you don't know anything about them or have no information, it might be better to just add them to the list of seiyū. Here is some information on stub articles. — flamingspinach | (talk) 22:03, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oh and also you might want to put [[Category:Japanese voice actors]] on your seiyuu pages. — flamingspinach | (talk) 22:07, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blood types...?

[edit]

Hi! While information about a subject is always welcome, listing someone's blood type in lieu of other more pertinent information isn't terribly useful unless your subject is in need of a transfusion.  :) Anyway, a good rule of thumb is three good, informative sentences should be the minimum for a stub article. Have fun! - Lucky 6.9 23:27, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately English-speaking wikipedians don't understand how important blood type is in Japanese culture, it's a kind of BIAS towards Western thinking. Kappa 03:55, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kotomi Yamakawa

[edit]

Notability of Naomi Inoue

[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Naomi Inoue, by Jeepday, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Naomi Inoue seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Naomi Inoue, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Naomi Inoue itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 13:44, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Misa Kobayashi

[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Misa Kobayashi, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No sources. No assertion of notability that can be assessed.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Scott Mac (Doc) 15:09, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Misa Kobayashi

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Misa Kobayashi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 01:33, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Misa Kobayashi

[edit]

I have nominated Misa Kobayashi, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Misa Kobayashi. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 02:29, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello CrazyInsaneAnimeFanGirl! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 243 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Azumi Yamamoto - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Mami Deguchi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Yū Kobayashi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Chiaki Ōsawa - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:28, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mami Deguchi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails both WP:N and WP:ENT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Allen4names (IPv6 contributions) 11:38, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mari Kanō has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN voice actress. Fails WP:BASIC

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 180.155.72.174 (talk) 12:40, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hazuki Tanaka

[edit]

The article Hazuki Tanaka has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Actress mainly has one supporting role in the Negima series and not much else.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AngusWOOF (talk) 01:04, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miho Sakuma

[edit]

The article Miho Sakuma has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Voice actor notable for just one role (Mana in Negima series) and it's a supporting character role.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 02:44, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ayana Sasagawa for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ayana Sasagawa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayana Sasagawa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 18:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chiaki Ōsawa for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chiaki Ōsawa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chiaki Ōsawa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 19:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]