User talk:Crashwheelx

Welcome!

Hello, Crashwheelx, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Pretty Green (talk) 15:10, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

HONOURS

Hi there WHEELX, VASCO from Portugal here,

as so many have done in the past, wrongfully, i see that you do too. PLEASE STOP removing the runner-up honours in player articles (they count in cups, national team competitions, etc) and respect other people's work.

Attentively, happy weekend - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 16:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize if my message sounded aggressive. --Vasco Amaral (talk) 18:05, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Football_records_in_Spain, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Hello, please do not undo my edits. Real Madrid had won 18 home matches on 1987-88 too. Check for yourself. Seaboy123 (talk) 05:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC) Seaboy123 (talk) 05:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Your claims are not backed by any references. I am happy to talk about this. So please take this into the talk page. Do not just revert or delete others edits. Seaboy123 (talk) 20:47, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Football_records_in_Spain, you may be blocked from editing. You are consistently vandalising the following articles: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Football_records_in_Spain http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_Madrid_C.F.

Please include only cited information. If you disagree about anything, take it to the talk page. This is a warning. If you engage in further nonconstructive and edits without citiation, you will be reported. Seaboy123 (talk) 03:03, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

While you are commenting on your edits, you need to enter the discussion on the article's talk page. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:31, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Real Madrid

Hi. I agree with the edits you are making to the lead of Real Madrid C.F., but can you contribute to the discussion at Talk:Real Madrid C.F.‎, otherwise it may be considered that you are edit warring. Thanks. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 16:03, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Real Madrid C.F. shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:15, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree but the user Seaboy is a former user who have been blocked on Wikipedia. He has admitted so on his talk page. He has repeatedly deleted correct information and is doing so in the "Spanish football records" page and is doing so with the Real Madrid page.

I have written a reply in the talk page. I can also quickly provide an Spanish source from an respected newspaper, not some unreliable amd biased blog, where it clearly states that FC Barcelona is the most successful both in terms of domestic and international trophies. The Spanish and Catalan Wikipedia pages also say that FC Barcelona is the most successful in terms of domestic and international trophies and they have provided realiable references. I can quote them in this thread if you wise. Therefore I am determined to remove the untrue edits made by Seaboy.--Crashwheelx (talk) 16:21, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Real Madrid C.F. with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ankit Maity ^{Talk | contribs} 16:26, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you should read the talk page before issuing warnings my friend. This user Seaboy has already been blocked by Wikipedia but has reappeared again with a new name.

Moreover the sources are from unreliable blogs. The statements are simply not true. BOTH the Spanish and Catalan Wikipedia pages agree that FC Barcelona have won the mot domestic and international trophies. There are several reliable Spanish sources quoted in both the Spanish and Catalan Wikipedia page about FC Barcelona that states the same. None in the Spanish and Catalan versions of the Real Madrid page. This is simply and untrue statement that most be removed.

For further evidence see Real Madrids discussion page.--Crashwheelx (talk) 16:34, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't insert comments about an article, or about editing it, in the article itself, as you did recently at Real Madrid C.F.. Such comments belong in the article's talk page. In addition, Wikipedia is not a reliable source, and so you cannot use content of other Wikipedia pages as justification for your edits. Finally, Wikipedia works by collaboration, not by individual editors who are convinced they are RIGHT repeatedly reverting to their own preferred version. Doing so, known as edit warring, is unacceptable, and if it continues after warning it can lead to an editor being blocked from editing. You are welcome to explain your reasons on the talk page in the hope of persuading others, but if consensus remains against you then you must not persist in trying to impose your own preferred version, no matter how convinced you are that you are right. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:34, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is a lengthy discussion on the talk page that you have chosen not to participate in. If you feel that this is a sockpuppet, report the editor rather than taking matters into your own hands. As you can see, there is more than one editor who is attempting to maintain consensus so it's not just this one editor.

I must also inform you that your actions have been reported to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:37, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Crashwheelx. You have new messages at JamesBWatson's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

JamesBWatson (talk) 17:08, 26 January 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Crashwheelx. You have new messages at Walter Görlitz's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Real Madrid F.C.. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 17:47, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Overseas Soccer Academy

Thank you for your attention. I have made a note in Talk:FC Barcelona. May be you know well about FC Barcelona, Europe or Spain, but my references may be right. In soccer business (only the business, not the championship), they were moving from Europe to Asia, mainly to China. Some Football clubs from Great Britain have also made soccer academy in Indonesia and might be in China too. Even some of FA soccer matches are done earlier (at high noon) to make convinience TV viewers in East, Southeast and South of Asias. Thank you again for your consideration.Gsarwa (talk) 19:14, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Football_records_in_Spain, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Hi, I am sorry to say but you are simply not contributing to wikipedia nor you have an interest in coming to discussions at related articles talk page. The edits you made here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Football_records_in_Spain&oldid=473331753 was just a simple revert of my edits. You have already been blocked for vandalising Real Madrid. I am giving you last warning from my side. Please STOP putting your own WP:POV and come for a healthy discussion on the article's talk page. As of now neither your claims nor your references back you up. Seaboy123 (talk) 23:41, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]