User talk:CrankyScorpion

Welcome!

Hello, CrankyScorpion, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Pascal.Tesson 05:53, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Geography/Geology of New Jersey

Hello, I saw your article at Palisades Sill. Thank you for your contribution. I would like to invite you to also contribute to the Geography of New Jersey article. It is much in need of an expert in Geography and Geology. Thank you. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 07:36, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invitiation. Sorry it's taken me so long to respond, I've been pulled in every direction. I've gone and added a section on the Newark Basin to the article, as well as writing a more geologically-in-depth article at Newark Basin. Thanks again and let me know if there's anything else I can help with. --CrankyScorption 05:10, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Geography of New Jersey COTW

I've nominated Geography of New Jersey for the article improvement drive. Support would be great for it. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 21:58, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your input. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 23:33, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GE Building

Hey - I added the composite image to the "See also" section. I think it's cool, but I'm unsure of it's staying power; however, I won't remove it from this section because I don't think it does any harm. The problem with the page is the clutter of photos, but the ones on there I think are all good. There's a way to get your photo into the main body of the article, tough: expand it. The clutter is because the article is pretty small, considering the historic nature of the building, but also its place in NYC history, who owns it, how it has changed hands, and the original purposes of it. Thanks for the compliments. Regarding vantage points: one excellent way to obtain good vantage points is....hotels. Most hotels have pretty much open-access to the higher floors (which often have windows in the hallways, or they have a restaurant, cafe or lounge at the top of them. If you look like you belong in the hotel (having your camera out helps) then you are unlikely to be questioned. The Hilton Times Square, though, only allows guest access to the floors; that is where I shot One Penn Plaza, when I went to photograph Gerald Posner. This has been a rarity, though. Before I obtained my good camera, I even made it to the Governor's Floor at the Millenium Hilton at Ground Zero, which I thought was surprising. If you are on a photo hunt around Manhattan, it might be worthwhile to just pop into a hotel, walk straight for the elevators, push a button for the top floor, and see where it takes you... --David Shankbone 15:37, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You helped choose Geography of New Jersey as this week's WP:ACID winner

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Geography of New Jersey was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

--ZeWrestler ^Talk 19:51, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CrankyScorpion

You imaged these basaltic columns near Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory in Palisades New York. I was unaware of these columns and I would like to vist them and image them. What road are these columns on? I wish to visit. I live in The Bronx. Can you send me directions to these columns?

Thanks

24.44.189.124 (talk) 18:30, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm replying to your question on my page because I didn't see one for you. Anyway, it's a bit hard to describe how to get to the columnar joints, but I'll try my best (it was over two years ago). The entrance to the hiking path I took is at the back of the parking lot near Lamont's Geochemistry Building. After going over and/or under several fallen logs and branches, the path forks in three near a tiny stream (which might be dry); the left path eventually leads to a small waterfall which is fed by the stream and to the bank of the Hudson River (after several bends and steps on the path), the straight path crosses that tiny stream and eventually links up to what I believe are other hiking trails (I didn't go too far in that direction), and the right path leads to the main road (Route 9W). The columns were on the straight path, not too far past the stream. If you don't have access to Lamont, there was an entrance to the hiking path just before the vehicle entrance to Lamont (which is where the right path takes you). I'd imagine that there are other hiking paths that connect to the straight path, but I wouldn't know how to get to them. Hope this helps. If you have any other questions, feel free to ask. -CrankyScorpion 20:37, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your RCA Bldg triptych...

Hope you don't mind a fan letter. I love your three shots of the RCA Building (showing my age) in Rock Center. The three "moods" you caught, just hours apart really, are just fascinating. Thanks for the work and the vision. — HarringtonSmith (talk) 05:18, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot, I appreciate the input! - CrankyScorpion (talk) 20:02, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cupid's Span.jpg

Hi there. Please note that non-free images cannot be used outside of the mainspace, and that each usage requires a separate, specific rationale. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me on my talk page. J Milburn (talk) 11:14, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As the license on the image states: "This image by is a derivative work of a separately copyrighted work of art. It is, therefore, treated on Wikipedia as non-free and each use within an article must satisfy the non-free content criteria." Part of the non-free content criteria (point #9 specifically) prohibits their display anywhere besides in actual articles. Please do not replace the image into the gallery on your user page. VernoWhitney (talk) 21:24, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, got it. CrankyScorpion (talk) 17:56, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cupid's Span.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cupid's Span.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:51, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, CrankyScorpion. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, CrankyScorpion. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cupid's Span.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cupid's Span.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Break-up of Pangaea.JPG

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

File:Break-up of Pangaea.JPG

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:31, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, CrankyScorpion. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, CrankyScorpion. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with your custom signature

You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you. 18:02, 7 September 2020 (UTC)