User talk:CranberrySunday7219
Hi, this is my talk page, leave a message here.
October 2023
[edit]
Hello, I'm Illusion Flame. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User talk:Ltbdl have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. - ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ญ๐๐๐๐ (๐๐๐๐)๐ฅ 00:32, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ย ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:32, 20 October 2023 (UTC)- @ScottishFinnishRadish Didnโt even do the full warnings before the block, doesnโt even matter if I edited anyoneโs page really. CranberrySunday7219 (talk) 00:34, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
- Administrators are not required to use all warnings before blocking. If you feel your block was unreasonable, you can follow the above instructions to appeal. - ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ญ๐๐๐๐ (๐๐๐๐)๐ฅ 00:37, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. Drmies (talk) 00:38, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
- Maybe you can use AI to explain to ScottishFinnishRadish why you should be unblocked. Drmies (talk) 00:39, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
- My suspicions were correct: Sockpuppetry - ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ญ๐๐๐๐ (๐๐๐๐)๐ฅ 00:40, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
- User:Illusion Flame, something about dogs and vomit. Drmies (talk) 00:58, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
- My suspicions were correct: Sockpuppetry - ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ญ๐๐๐๐ (๐๐๐๐)๐ฅ 00:40, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
