User talk:Craigmiller123

December 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2014–15 United States network television schedule. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Davejohnsan (talk) 16:05, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2014–15 United States network television schedule, you may be blocked from editing. Davejohnsan (talk) 16:29, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Code Black (TV series)

The article Code Black (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced. No evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Amortias (T)(C) 20:07, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Family (2016 TV series). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Logical Fuzz (talk) 23:44, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2015–16 United States network television schedule, you may be blocked from editing. Logical Fuzz (talk) 23:46, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Guide to Surviving Life, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Logical Fuzz (talk) 08:00, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Guys with Kids. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Logical Fuzz (talk) 08:04, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Limitless (TV series). Logical Fuzz (talk) 08:07, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Krakatoa Katie 00:27, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2015–16 United States network television schedule. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Logical Fuzz (talk) 18:31, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at The Simpsons, you may be blocked from editing. Logical Fuzz (talk) 18:33, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Real O'Neals. Logical Fuzz (talk) 18:40, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Darkwind (talk) 21:17, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

The name of the series is Family Guy, stop adding the to the title.Vincelord (talk) 16:19, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Craigmiller123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am ready to edit wikipedia again this time and I'm gonna use it the right way Craigmiller123 (talk) 23:34, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:19, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Craigmiller123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I used the original account Jezebel's Ponyo as told by someone else, can you try it now

Decline reason:

You were socking at least as recently as 2 months ago. You need to stay away from Wikipedia for a much longer time (think a year at least) before an unblock is considered. only (talk) 01:42, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{unblock|reason=this is all my fault and I'm sorry for socking wikipedia, here are the user that i socked on wikipedia. Happysaddy, Forchef, Momjob, Nickyellow, Robotbird, Birdsangry, Danger 145, Fear180, Friendios105, Good457, Gigglemom, Goodies135, Jobmom, Top Wing82829, and Candlebox Spacehog. I Promised i will never sock wikipedia ever again. Craigmiller123 (talk) 15:01, 23 June 2018 (UTC)}[reply]

unblock discussion and formatting socks

Happysaddy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Forchef (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Momjob (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Nickyellow (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Robotbird (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Birdsangry (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Danger 145 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Fear180 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Friendios105 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Good457 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Gigglemom (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Goodies135 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Jobmom (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Top Wing82829 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Candlebox Spacehog (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log).

I see the original block was for adding unsourced content. Please explain how you will avoid this problem in the future.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:07, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Craigmiller123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

to avoid this problem in the future, i have to not add unsourced content, be on one account, create my own article, be a good account user Craigmiller123 (talk) 17:40, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've been evading your block as recently as this month. In August of 2017, you were told you had to stay away from Wikipedia for much longer than two months. Rather than doing so, you evaded your block earlier this week. You've shown you cannot be trusted. You are now considered banned from Wikipedia, not just blocked, under WP:3X. Unblock request declined. Yamla (talk) 12:41, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.