User talk:Craigantaggart

Speedy deletion of Sir Denholm de Montalt Fraser

A tag has been placed on Sir Denholm de Montalt Fraser requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. SomeUsr | Talk Contribs 09:43, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Sir Stuart Fraser

A tag has been placed on Sir Stuart Fraser requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. SomeUsr | Talk Contribs 09:51, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Craigantaggart, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! SomeUsr | Talk Contribs 10:04, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sorry for your "rough start" here on wiki, but we get spammed and vandalized steadily and therefor some of us are very short tempered with people who steadily break wiki's rules. keep on editing, make yourself familiar with wikipedia and soon you may become a good editor at wikipedia. kind regards SomeUsr | Talk Contribs 10:38, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I can see you're having some troubles. I speedy deleted the above articles, not because they weren't notable but because you can't just post a Times article here without their permission. It's a breach of copyright, which can get Wikipedia into trouble.

Now, re Charles Fraser (of Blackdown Park). It's very hard to work out what claims of notability he has. What would you say would be the #1 most notable thing about him?

Getting new articles into Wikipedia is not easy for newbies. We generally recommend you start by editing existing articles first. --Dweller (talk) 13:45, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Charles Torquil de Montalt Fraser

A tag has been placed on Charles Torquil de Montalt Fraser requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. SomeUsr | Talk Contribs 15:41, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

retag since no edits were made anymore SomeUsr | Talk Contribs 15:43, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Charles Torquil de Montalt Fraser

A tag has been placed on Charles Torquil de Montalt Fraser requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Cheeseman Muncher (talk) 12:33, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, this was incorrectly flagged. See also User_talk:Cheeseman_Muncher#Incorrect speedy deletion flagging -- John (Daytona2 · Talk · Contribs) 17:27, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Charles Torquil de Montalt Fraser, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you.

This had already been discussed on Talk:Charles Torquil de Montalt Fraser, and as admin User:Cobaltbluetony said of your related Speedy Deletion request "Sufficient notability has been achieved and the article was restored in good faith; user's involvement and coi is not considered to have had a detrimental impact on the content quality." -- John (Daytona2 · Talk · Contribs) 21:20, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]