User talk:Craig Stuntz/Archives/2021/July

WikiProject Military history: Coordinator elections

The Military history WikiProject is currently holding elections for project coordinators. Any member of the project may nominate themselves and all are encouraged to vote here. The elections will run until February 5.

--Loopy ^e 04:55, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Mairéad Ní Mhaonaigh

Hi - I gave the IPA a go, but I'm no expert. Maybe you could consider this: Mairéad Ní Mhaonaigh (pronounced mɑː.ˈɹɪəd niː ˈwiːˌneɪ (IPA); sounds like: "Muh-reed Nee Wee-ney") --Mal 21:58, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for trying, but I'm sufficiently unfamiliar with the IPA to even know if that's close! :) --Craig Stuntz 00:52, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Me too - but at least I tried! I think we should look out for articles that have IPA references, find out who added the pronounciation and leave them a message. :) I'll keep my eyes peeled. --Mal 13:42, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

I went ahead and stuck in your version for now. Fergananim had changed it to "Mhar-aid Nee Mh-way-ney," which, when you think about how Americans vs. Irish folks might read this, is a good example of why the MoS recommends IPA in the first place! --Craig Stuntz 14:24, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Fiddling

You're probably right. I don't know why someone thought Fiddle needed a disambig page in the first place. I've given up on that one for a while and moving on to others where I understand the substance of the articles a bit more. --Russ Blau (talk) 21:06, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Help request

Good evening. I've seen your edits on several talk pages, so I imagine you are quite adept at it. How do you add a poster's IP address if they've forgotten to sign? Many thanks. Kilbosh 17:51, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

First, you need to figure out who it was. To do that, look at the page history. If they added their comment a while ago this may take some trial and error, but use the (diff) button for an individual edit to see what was changed in each edit. Once you've figured out who made the change you can note the fact. Let's say the username was "Foo". Edit the talk page, find the comment, and add {{subst:unsigned|Foo}} to the end.

Some explanation of this: unsigned is a template which expands into the full message. subst means that your edit should contain the expanded template text rather than {{unsigned|Foo}}, which is what would show in the "edit" screen if you didn't use subst. This means Wikipedia doesn't have to re-expand the template every time the page is loaded, and also means that if the template is vandalized your comment won't be vandalised. "|Foo" means pass the value "Foo" as the first parameter to the template. In this case the first parameter is the username. You can find out what the parameters for various templates do by visiting their Talk page. --Craig Stuntz 18:03, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks !

Thanks for the suggestions regarding the Dál Riata things. Much appreciated. AWB certainly looks like it might be the way to fix the Lists of State Rulers in year X things (but my "technical solution" question was a bit vague: it was directed more at having those pages built automatically). Cheers ! Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:30, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Just a Hello

I was going through the revision page of the flute article, and saw your name! Small internet, huh? I sent you a C&F PM. Daiv

Military history WikiProject Newsletter, Issue I

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter Issue I - March 2006
Project news An independent military history peer review has been created for the benefit of the project. A number of articles have already been reviewed, receiving significantly more feedback within the project than they did on the generic peer review page. The project's Collaboration of the Fortnight got off to a great start with Ferdinand Foch and is now focusing on the military history of Spain. Two new task forces—dealing with warfare during classical antiquity and the Middle Ages—have been created. An effort to build a catalogue of high-quality maps for use in military history articles is now underway. The newly-formed translation department is looking for volunteers to help with translating featured articles from other-language Wikipedias.	From the Coordinators Welcome to the inaugural issue of the Military history WikiProject's newsletter! We hope that this new format will help members—especially those who may be unable to keep up with some of the rapid developments that tend to occur—find new groups and programs within the project that they may wish to participate in. Please consider this inital issue to be a prototype; as always, any comments and suggestions are quite welcome, and will help us improve the newsletter in the coming months. Kirill Lokshin, Lead Coordinator
Current proposals Proposed guidelines for categories of military people are currently being discussed. A number of issues have already been resolved, but the proposed scheme is still in draft form and further input would be very welcome.

delivered by Loopy ^e 04:39, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Initial Developer's Public License

I agree that this article should not be on Wikipedia, but it seems to me to be very appropriate for Wikisource. I'd prefer to see it transwikied instead of just being deleted. Can I ask you to list it on WP:AFD instead of WP:PROD? GeorgeStepanek\^talk 09:12, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

OK; done. --Craig Stuntz 17:51, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Thank you! GeorgeStepanek\^talk 04:43, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Abhai Gulab McShah

Thanks. I agree. I'll delete it. There was already a speedy delete tag on it, but another vandal came along and added more nonsense and removed the tag. AnnH ♫ 11:30, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Ref converter

Just a note for the future, once you've used Ref converter it will return with an "edit page" link right above the output. If you follow that link it takes you back to the appropriate edit box on Wikipedia with the edit summary already filled out; this should save a bit of time in converting references. Thanks for your help with the project! --Cyde Weys 14:29, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue II

The April 2006 issue of the project newsletter is now out. You may read this issue or change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you by following the link. Thanks. Kirill Lokshin 18:33, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Hi Craig, I was going to put a for the gaelic influence part of the clarsach, as bluegolds P.O.V has no empirical backup. But decided not to bother as bluegold would start all his sockpuppetry again. Didnt sign in but I hope this verifies it was me.[[User:Celtic harper ] 14:40, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Can't see big probs with the sceala crowd, there is bigger spamlinks on some of these pages.86.42.153.163 01:43, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Regarding "bigger spamlinks," do feel free to remove those, too. But consdering the "sceala crowd," which is likely one person, please review this threat to disrupt Wikipedia should the Sceala links be removed. --Craig Stuntz 01:47, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

-Barry-

I'll try to review what I type for tone, but neither of the notes that you left are what I would term "attacks" in any way. I'm not saying, "this asshole is going around spewing his filth," etc. I'm saying, "User:-Barry- has been taking heat for injecting these flawed benchmark results in Perl, so he's come here. Good faith credulity is strained." (that's the exact edit summary that you cited as an "attack".) [1]

The fact of the matter is that I have made gestures to try to get -Barry- to be a contributor, rather than a POV-pusher on Perl. I've re-written his contributions (against my better judgement, when others have simply reverted them) to try to make them more encyclopedic [2] he has then immediately reverted those attempts at compromise [3]. I've consistently been the "good cop" when he is being directly attacked [4], asking others to cease their personal attacks, and I was even the one who brought the mediation page to his attention. [5]

So, I guess I'm asking for you to help me by explaining what it is that you consider "attackish", here. Help me to understand how you're interpreting policy so that I can bring that to my own work.

Thanks. -Harmil 14:02, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue III - May 2006

The May 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —ERcheck @ 23:01, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

article on W. H. Grattan Flood, june 2006

Craig: thanks for editing my page on W. H. Grattan Flood. it certainly looks a lot better after your cleanup. i am slow at picking up on all the wikipedia protocols but i am progressing. i guess wikipedia does not have a spell checker?. in any event i am so thankful that we have the wikipedia resource.

spell checker

Craig: mucho gratias; why didnt i think of that? joebrophy

Relational database

Hi, I've started to invite other people to work on relational database. It would be great if you could come back. (you can reply here I'll watchlist you) Ideogram 02:21, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

I'm still around; just very busy at the moment. --Craig Stuntz 12:12, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue IV - June 2006

The June 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Kirill Lokshin 06:02, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Tip of the day project update

Just trying to get things better organized around there. Toward that end, I've created a task list template for the project. If all the members of the project placed it on their user page, we could all keep in touch more easily (with announcements, alerts, etc.). It, and the latest announcements can be found at:

totd task list template

--Go for it! 17:19, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Tannahill Weavers

Hi Craig. In case you don't already know, the Tannahill Weavers will be appearing in Brittany (Sunday 6th August 2006) at the closing concert of the [Festival Interceltique de Lorient].

• Official Festival website

--maelor 12:16, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Category sorting

I did know that, but I didn't know an Ó fell under that too. I thought an Ó was a totally different character than a normal O? Or do you simply pronounce it the same way so it doesn't matter. Obviously I am not Irish. :) Garion96 (talk) 18:38, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Plus, of course, thanks for fixing it. Garion96 (talk) 18:44, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Learned something new today. Thanks for the explanation. Garion96 (talk) 18:58, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue V - July 2006

The July 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history Coordinator Elections!

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by August 11!

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot - 18:27, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

to be or not to be rennet

dear Craig - I do not know if this is the right way of comunication, but I try it this way. I know somethig about rennet and about interests of big companies and all that stuff and I know that there is alot of miss-information going round - especially considering the information of vegetarians. I wrote "the most common" because rennet is ex difinitionem natural rennet and 99.9% of the rennet comes from cows and calves.

Everything else is an artificial coagulant or chymosin produced by genetically modified bacteria or yeast or mould. So these things are rennet-substitutes.

This is like cheese and analog cheese - cheese has at least to have seen milk - analog-cheese you are mixing with some ingredients in a mixer - has never seen any milk.

But compliments to you - you are quick in reaction - as soon as I know how to start it, I will start my user page - kind regards from Austria - my name is wolfgang (Bioren 14:38, 2 August 2006 (UTC))

"Symmetrical relativity"

I am going to propose this article for an AfD, and will add the other one to the discussion as a related article. It doesn't look like we are going to get the author to co-operate. I also don't want an edit war over talk page reversions, of all things. We can then have one, centralised, discussion on the AfD page. I hope this works. Byrgenwulf 19:35, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Sounds good. I wanted to give him the chance to fix the article, but I think you all are confirming my suspicions that it isn't fixable. --Craig Stuntz 19:36, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Halting Problem

While I agree that we should have a source for the paragraph you eliminated, I am surprised that you disagree with it -- it seems nearly self-evident to me.

1. All practical computers are deterministic finite-state machines.
2. A deterministic machine's next state is completely determined by its current state (program, data, processor state).
3. Therefore, if a machine in state Q evolves once again into state Q, the program will never halt.
4. Because the number of states are finite, albeit large, the machine must either halt or reach state Q in a finite time.
5. Simulating the machine is, perforce, an algorithm, and the algorithm is guaranteed to produce a result in a finite time.
6. Therefore, a solution for a finite-state machine may require simulation on a machine orders of magnitude faster than that of the machine itself, but it is not formally undecidable.
7. For a Turing machine, there is no upper bound to the run time of such a simulation.

Unsourced, yes. Untrue, I don't think so. Robert A.West (Talk) 17:10, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

You say deterministic; the section I removed linked Linear bounded automaton which Wikipedia has as "a restricted form of a non-deterministic Turing machine." There is a problem with the precision of terminology, I think. Second, in addition to requiring a computer orders of magnitued faster than the machine itself, the storage would need to be orders of magnitude larger. Is that a reasonable solution? Maybe, maybe not. I wasn't comfortable with the way it was, and I wasn't prepared to write a better version without any source.

Nice to hear from you, Robert! --Craig Stuntz 17:41, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

I am using terminology from ancient memory, so the fault of terminology is undoubtedly mine there. I meant predictable as opposed to stochastic -- a quantum computer might not be fully predictable from its state and input. I agree that the practical conclusion from the halting problem that it cannot be solved even for finite machines of any useful size given a program of any useful complexity, but I am not sure how that statement is (or if it can be) formalized. Still, I think there is in there a real point about the application of theoretical results to real-world machines that should be properly researched, source and included. Something else to do in that faroff day when I have time. Robert A.West (Talk) 18:18, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Termination analysis is presently red linked, but coverage of that area seems to me to be a good way to discuss practical applications. --Craig Stuntz 18:23, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

My mention of practical applications was an aside. To look at it another way, applying both the diagonalization proof and my observation above to a machine with finite memory proves that to solve the Halting Problem on machine M₀, you need a bigger machine M₁. Since any Turing machine is, in this sense, M_{$\aleph _{0}$}, they are all the same size, and the halting problem for a program on a Turing machine is undecidable on Turing machines. It might not be undecidable on hypercomputers. This ought to be sourceable, but it is the sort of trivially-proven unsourced statement that is tolerated in many CS and math-related articles. Robert A.West (Talk) 18:01, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

As far as I'm aware hypercomputers can solve the halting problem pretty much by definition but they have the downside of not existing.

I don't have a problem with the statement as you express it above, as I think it's more precise and makes it clear that it's not refuting Turing's proof.

As an aside, hypercomputing discusses Ω, but it doesn't seem to be in Halting problem. That's a bit odd (although not as odd as Ω itself). --Craig Stuntz 18:18, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election - vote phase!

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will select seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of eleven candidates. Please vote here by August 26!

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot - 11:29, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue VI - August 2006

The August 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 12:00, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history Newsletter - Issue VII - September 2006

The September 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by Grafikbot - 19:00, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VIII - October 2006

The October 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 21:08, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

wikEd

The wikEdlogo

Hi, I have seen that you are using the Cacycle editor extension. This program is no longer actively maintained in favor of its much more powerful successor wikEd.

wikEd has all the functionality of the old editor plus:• syntax highlighting • nifty image buttons • morefixing buttons • paste formatted text from Word or web pages• convert the formatted text into wikicode • adjustthe font size • and much, much more.

Switching to wikEd is easy, check the detailed installation description on its project homepage. Usually it is as simple as changing every occurrence of editor.js into wikEd.js on your User:YourUsername/monobook.js page.

Cacycle 21:33, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue IX - November 2006

The November 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

RE: Your edit to Object-oriented programming

Sorry I removed your edits. I was trying to get rid of vandalism, but I reverted too far. Thanks for fixing it.--Bkwillwm 06:23, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue X - December 2006

The December 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:28, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Divje Babe

Hi. I noticed that you are an active editor that at one time (a few months ago) made comments about the problem at Divje Babe (it may have been called Neanderthal flute at the time?). I am having difficulty finding a third party to discuss the issues with. You said at that time that "I find the above discussion disturbing on a number of levels." at Talk:Divje Babe. I was wondering if you're willing to step in and offer comment on the more recent developments on that page. Most editors seem to eventually be scared away by Mr. Bob Fink's lengthy tribe and give up. I have also received similar treatement from him when I attempted to remove his irrelevant self-promotion from the Musical acoustics article (a matter which is still in dispute), and expect more of it as I discover more of it embedded eksewhere into Wikipedia.

Would you care to offer any comment on this at Talk:Divje Babe? Thanks. - Rainwarrior 07:08, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

our == Pictish Dates ==

Hi Craig, I've tried to include dates for the Ultrich Palster and Pictish stones on the harp page but the post doesnt seem to load up as if I've never edited, but the history says I'm the only one to have edited lately. Any ideas whats wrong? Could you have a look at it to see if theres a problem. 23:59, 27 December 2006 Celtic Harper (Talk | contribs) Thank you. Celtic Harper 01:20, 28th December 2006 (UTC)

I can see your changes. What's missing?

As an aside, please use edit summaries when saving a page. --Craig Stuntz 23:55, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Advice on how to archive talk pages

Thanks for the advice on how to properly archive talk pages! I'll go back and fix up the pages I 'archived' by deleting them :-) --Surturz 22:16, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

List of All-Ireland Champions

I have been working on this for a while, fancy giving me a hand Beaumontproject 20:10, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

OK. I took the easy way out and emailed CCÉ to see if they already have a list. If I recall correctly, the citation for Micho Russell is Valelly's Companion and the source for Mary Bergin is the liner notes to one of her CDs, but I'd have to look them up to be sure. --Craig Stuntz 03:53, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Cool, let me know how you get on, I actually know both of them All-Ireland Champions I was hoping that the source might lead to other champions. I do know of various other champions for other years but they are just listed in my Treoir magazines but I can not find the same references on the net. Also I have found a link of the CCE website with results since 1996 so those need to be inputted (I have start) it needs finishing, also anything before that needs to go in Beaumontproject 16:55, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Any joy from CCE? Beaumontproject

No, no word yet. If I haven't heard anything in another week or two I'll ask elsewhere. --Craig Stuntz 03:13, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

No luck then I take it. Beaumontproject 12:53, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

I have not had time for serious Wikipedia work in several weeks. --Craig Stuntz 16:57, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

I understand.Beaumontproject 11:39, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

My edition was link spam?????

You recently removed the link Super Physics I added from IP 202.5.149.94 as link spam. Did you even properly read what was there, before so neatly removing the link? Agreed, it is my own website, but then, it is strictly in line with Wikipedia terms. And what good would I get out of having links anyway? For God's sake, it's based on a free server and it's not as if it's for business or anything. Consider a revision, if you please. By the way, that stuff on my site is an amalgam of many different encyclopedias - taken with permission. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.5.149.94 (talk • contribs).

Yes, I read what was there. I also posted information on the talk page for this IP on why the additions were inappropriate. Please read it carefully, in particular Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. This is official Wikipedia policy, not my personal opinion. I could explain in detail why the links were inappropriate, but it's really already explained better in the articles I linked on your user page, so please do read them. If you'd like to contribute article text instead of links then your contributions would be most welcome. If you're just interested in promoting your personal web site, could I suggest http://dmoz.org ? --Craig Stuntz 20:39, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Agreed. I had not read that specific page of Wikipedia ploicy. In my enthusiasm, I most probably skipped it. Thanks for for telling me about it, I was about to add more links elsewhere, about physics. And by the way, I'm not really interested in promoting my site, I'm just an 18 year old physics buff. Thanks again. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.5.149.94 (talk) 12:47, 11 January 2007 (UTC).

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XI - January 2007

The January 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 20:26, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

WP:MILHIST Coordinator Elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 11!

Delivered by grafikbot 10:19, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Military History elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by February 25!

Delivered by grafikbot 13:47, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XII - February 2007

The February 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 14:53, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIII - March 2007

The March 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 18:45, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIV (April 2007)

The April 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 13:44, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XV (May 2007)

The May 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:36, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI (June 2007)

The June 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 13:34, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator selection

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by August 14! Kirill 02:50, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators from a pool of fourteen candidates to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by August 28! Kirill 00:58, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XVIII (August 2007)

The August 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 09:14, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XIX (September 2007)

The September 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 09:15, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XX (October 2007)

The October 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 13:44, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXI (November 2007)

The November 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 01:13, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXII (December 2007)

The December 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:41, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14! TomStar81 (Talk) 02:22, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIII (January 2008)

The January 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:30, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIV (February 2008)

The February 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:14, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)

The March 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:53, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Origins of the Harp in Europe

Hi Graig I just wondered if I could ask some advice about the Origin of the harp in Europe page. I would like to ask you some advice in the matter of my work in the Origins of the Harp in Europe page. A speedy deletion tag request by an unsigned editor 93.107.128.92 for the origins of the European Harp in Europe page. I have researched this article well and have cited academic references throughout and despite 38 references in the Irish section alone, the unsigned editor has placed a dubious tag and has requested the whole page be deleted for pov violation.

I feel that this view is unjust and I have merely cited the views of academia and all of my sources are backed up by recent Irish centric and the current standard view of research and empirical publications. Most of these sources range from 2000 – 2005 and the lyre prodonminates in Irish carvings rather than a triangular harp within an Irish context is nothing new as cited by one of the great celtic harp historians Roslyn Rensch (1989) and has been even commented Edward Bunting (2000) originally published in 1843. I feel this editor cannot find a valid source to back up his accusations of pov and wishes to remove the page which is backed up by refrences. Also studies from Edward Bunting 1843, JASTOR Grey University of Michigan 1956, Kenneth Mathieson 2001 and Daibhi OCoinin in a New History of Ireland, prehistoric and early history (2005) conclude the triangular harp was not evident in Ireland till the Anglo-Norman invasion.

How can I get the article peer reviewed and the dubious tag off the page, as far as I have seen the majority of studies cite the lyre and not the triangular harp as the Irish instrument of choice before the anglo-norman invasion? I have even had random acts of vandalism on the page [[6]] where another unsigned editor 78.19.156.62 changing researched sources to a gaelic pov totally taking the cited sourse out of context. Can you help as I feel that I have put a lot of hard work into this page, wishing to improve wikipedia as a credible cited sourse on the internet. Cheers Celtic Harper (talk) 11:58, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:InterBase Performance Monitor.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:InterBase Performance Monitor.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 18:36, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

FastCode

Craig, I would like your opinion on the FastCode reference in the Embarcadero article. "Delphi is development environment for software developers and database application developers who need to maintain software applications. Parts of the Runtime Library (RTL) were replaced with contributions made by the cummunity project FastCode which provided compatible but faster replacements." This is the only paragraph in the article about Delphi. If I were going to mention one thing about Delphi, it wouldn't be FastCode. It doesn't even get this much mention on the Delphi page itself, which has 4 paragraphs about Delphi 2006 alone. With not one reference to FastCode.

Seems to me that the references that we do have on the Delphi page are sufficient, and should be removed from the EMB page. But I wasn't sure if this was a good idea in the midst of the FastCode deletion discussion. Your thoughts? Blwhite (talk) 21:49, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

I agree with you. The grammar in that bit is suspect, as well. --Craig Stuntz (talk) 22:47, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Overturn In addition to the references listed above... Very nice summary argument. Well done. Blwhite (talk) 15:30, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Craig Stuntz. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Craig Stuntz. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Craig Stuntz. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Craig Stuntz. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)