User talk:TourismAdvocate

Welcome!

Hello, Craig Dodge, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Phare Circus, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Equine-man (talk) 06:32, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Phare Circus

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Phare Circus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Equine-man (talk) 06:32, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your quick action on my recent submission. I read the guidelines and remained as factual as I could, including ample 3rd party references from reliable sources. The page being submitted is for the social business extension of an existing page: Phare Ponleu Selpak non-profit school. Both the school and the social enterprise have been recognized by public and private sector for the work they do in arts education, poverty alleviation and sustainable tourism. I indeed work for the organization, as I openly disclosed, but it shouldn't detract from the validity or value of the information. Your guidance for improvement would be greatly appreciated. Craig Dodge (talk) 06:50, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phare Circus (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nagol0929 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Phare Circus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nagol0929 (talk) 12:37, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Craig Dodge! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nagol0929 (talk) 12:37, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Nagol0929, thank you for your reply. I'm not so much disappointed as I am confused and frustrated. I spent hours reading the guidelines. I wrote the post as objectively as I could, referencing respected, reliable, external sources for points made. I also roughly followed the style of the Wikipedia article for our parent organization Phare Ponleu Selpak. I saw that another admin flagged it for deletion, followed immediately by yet another admin rejecting and removing the flag. The messages I got were the perfectly vague template generated materials directing me to the references I'd already read. It would be more helpful to give an example of something written, how it violated the policy and an example of how to correct it. I will check the teahouse and the chat with help from experienced editors, but I'm at a loss. Craig Dodge (talk) 21:18, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again @Nagol0929. I have edited the draft. Would it be possible to get your feedback before I resubmit it? Craig Dodge (talk) 03:58, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Craig Dodge: sorry for the late response, but yes I’ll have a look at it. Nagol0929 (talk) 11:38, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The current version of the article is extremely better than the version I declined. I would accept the article in its current state however I personally will not do it as I might not be completely impartial. Nagol0929 (talk) 11:41, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For future reference I would look at WP:NPOV and WP:WTW. Also if/when this draft is accepted into an article I would recommend making edit requests in the future. Nagol0929 (talk) 11:51, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again for your guidance. I've further fixed some language and citations. I'll look again later with fresh eyes before submitting. Once submitted and if accepted, I will indeed make edit requests. I'm wondering if the ample amount of third-party citations wouldn't validate the information as being unbiased? Craig Dodge (talk) 22:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Citations mainly provide accreditation of facts and to prove that a subject is notable. If you are directly quoting a citation then I would look at WP:QUOTE and related to that WP:NPS. Mainly articles use citations to back up claims but they dont decide on wording using claims. In short, no amount of citations will make the article unbiased due to the fact that the editors decide the wording. Nagol0929 (talk) 02:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Phare Circus

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Phare Circus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Nagol0929 (talk) 12:37, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phare Circus (August 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Youknowwhoistheman was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Phare Circus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Youknow? (talk) 21:16, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback. I respect the requirement for in-depth, reliable, secondary and strictly independent sources.

There are indeed several of those already included: Full, in depth articles on CNN, VOA, NYT and Christian Science Monitor. There are shorter, yet fully dedicated reviews and articles of 2 or more paragraphs on Lonely Planet, Guinness World Records, Event Adelaide and Sydney Scoop.

I can add a link to a 30-minute Al Jazeera documentary and a full length article on Agence France Presse, but I'm concerned the post already has a relatively large number of citations.

Could you please clarify the noteworthiness or deficiencies of those above citations? There are indeed others that could be included, but it would help me to know clearly what is insufficient. TourismAdvocate (talk) 01:57, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phare Circus has been accepted

Phare Circus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 15:32, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Channy Chhoeun has been accepted

Channy Chhoeun, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 07:28, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]