User talk:Crafanc

Speedy deletion of Thomas Talbott

A tag has been placed on Thomas Talbott requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pgagnon999 (talk) 04:50, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Julie Murphy

Someone has edited "Julie Murphy" to refer to an actress in the film "Sleepay Camp II". I suspect there must be three people of this name. Do you think we need a disambiguation page? Ogg (talk) 07:05, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thomas Talbott

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Thomas Talbott, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Aboutmovies (talk) 08:24, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcomespam!

Welcome!

Hello, Crafanc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! John Z (talk) 15:45, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now that that is taken care of

Though you're not so new, thought it might be proper to welcome you. Just took a look at your article on Talbott and "de-prodded" it. He is of course clearly quite notable, and your talk page argument was 100% correct, and should have been immediately decisive (took me a couple minutes to realize this myself though). In fact some trout-slapping (not you) might be in order. Anyways, keep up the good work!John Z (talk) 15:45, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image of Matthew Rhys

Hi, welcome to Wikipedia. You recently added an image of Matthew Rhys to the article about him. However, this has had to be removed, as Wikipedia policy generally does not permit images of living people that have not been released to Wikipedia under a free licence such as the GFDL or a Creative Commons licence to be used in articles. This is because such an image is regarded as replaceable – a volunteer has the opportunity to take a new photograph of the subject and to license it to Wikipedia freely. For more information, see "Wikipedia:Non-free content". Sorry about that. — Cheers, Truth's Out There ^–talk– 02:57, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Peithynen - displaying Bardic Alphabet (coelbren y beirdd).jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:Peithynen - displaying Bardic Alphabet (coelbren y beirdd).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:26, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Welsh-Americans.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Welsh-Americans.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:01, 5 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Edward (talk) 09:01, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Welsh American. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 23:51, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Welsh Americans.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Welsh Americans.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:06, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Welsh Americans.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Welsh Americans.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. PhilKnight (talk) 15:16, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Dinys Powys Brooch.jpg)

You've uploaded File:Dinys Powys Brooch.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:31, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gathering Day

I've left a query about the title of the article Gathering Day on its talk page. As you appear to be the principal author perhaps you would like to reply? I've no problem with the bulk of the article, by the way (although it could do with some individual references, for clarity), just the title. Regards, Enaidmawr (talk) 00:18, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Hereford Gospels - Gospel of St. John.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Hereford Gospels - Gospel of St. John.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:51, 5 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:51, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Physicians of Myddfai was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha Quadrant ^talk 19:00, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:West Wales.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:West Wales.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:49, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gathering Day (2)

Hi. Just to let you know that I've asked the copyright team to check that the "Customs and rituals" section of Gathering Day, and article you created, to ask them to ensure that the article complies with the copyright terms of Hilaire Wood's page. However, I've also proposed deletion of Gathering Day as it appears to muddle two different things. Calan Awst takes place in August and Gathering Day in June (Midsummer's Day). --Stfg (talk) 10:26, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ricemarch Psalter, Psalm 1.JPG missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Ricemarch Psalter, Psalm 1.JPG

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:53, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Physicians of Myddfai concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Physicians of Myddfai, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:49, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission The Physicians of Myddfai

Hello Crafanc. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled The Physicians of Myddfai.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Physicians of Myddfai}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:27, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dinas Powys Brooch.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dinas Powys Brooch.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:26, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]