User talk:Crackajack Mac

Leave messages

ANI thread

See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#please_block_sock. --Enric Naval (talk) 21:52, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

This is unacceptable [1], read Wikipedia:Civility: " It is not appropriate to edit or remove another editor's comment". If you do this again, you will be blocked. --Kurdo777 (talk) 22:03, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Kosova, you will be blocked from editing. Tadija (talk) 22:30, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 22:40, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Crackajack Mac (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry, I was showing a new user how to edit on wikipedia with the Slobodan Milosevic article and accidently hit "Save" instead of "Show Preview", it was 100% accidental. The rest of my edits refer to actual feelings so please unblock

Decline reason:

You are being blocked because there are a problem with all of your edits, not just one incident. Editing based on "actual feelings" does not justify disruption. -- Atama頭 22:54, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Crackajack Mac (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No similarity between the edits by Eric Naval. What is wrong with ALL my edits? And what is wrong with ANY ONE of them? I guess Tadija doesn't like them but then that is to be expected from a Serbian nationalist. Please unblock me and I will change for the better. Sorry I offended someone.

Decline reason:

Nice try, Human Rights Believer. –MuZemike 23:10, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hahaha. Very funny. Insult me. Yes, where is your proof MuZemike? Did you do a Usercheck??? Did you match my unique IP address with Mr.Human Rights Believer???? Let's see. Crackajack Mac (talk) 23:16, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]