User talk:Crackajack1

Image tagging for Image:PICT06.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:PICT06.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:11, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Mateszalka FC.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Mateszalka FC.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:09, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Ex-plosion.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Ex-plosion.JPG. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:46, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ex-Plosion

Hello, Crackajack1, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you worked on, Ex-Plosion, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

It helps to explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the Help Desk. Thanks again for contributing! Steven Walling • talk 22:17, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Oazis FC for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oazis FC is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oazis FC until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — NickK (talk) 16:32, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Until I Got U

The article Until I Got U has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:NOTABILITY guidelines

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 19:58, 27 October 2013 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 19:58, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nocturnal Flame

The article Nocturnal Flame has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Album which doesn't meet WP:NALBUM by band whose article was deleted

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 20:01, 27 October 2013 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 20:01, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]