User talk:CrZTgR

North American Currency Union

You left this message on my talk page. Can I help you? I'm not sure from just that header what you are asking about. Thanks, Gwernol 00:38, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Gwernol#North American currency union CrZTgR (talk) 01:07, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Amero is a hypothetical currency. Once it become formally planned and moves towards implementation, it could be included in an article like Euro. At the moment its something a few people have suggested. We couldn't possibly include every idea that someone somewhere thinks up. If you can provide independent, published sources that show the Amero is something significant that is being seriously considered as a common currency for North America, you can put it back in. Gwernol 00:43, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK. But as I said North American currency union is still interestng from academical debate point of view. How do you propose that we put it in Euro#See also? Because that's where it belongs as another topic of interest, not in other parts of Euro article for sure, as it is mostly just debated by scholars at this point. CrZTgR (talk) 01:07, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comments

Hi there,

Is a bit long, but can you comment at Template_talk:Euro_adoption_future#I_propose_to_change_the_name_and_the_structure? It will be very much appreciated.

Thanks, Miguel.mateo (talk) 15:38, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WTA Ranking Points Distribution 2008

Template:WTA Ranking Points Distribution 2008 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:43, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]