User talk:Cparis2300

Welcome!

Hello, Cparis2300, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! - Dyork (talk) 14:46, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

your edits to Resonance

Hello! I reverted your recent edit to Resonance for several reasons. RLC (rlc) is a standard term, there is no need to follow every instance with the lower-case version. Several of your additions were non-grammatical. For instance: "The fundamental mode and the first 5 harmonics." is not a sentence. Also, you marked your edit as minor when it was not a minor edit: please read up on the use of the minor edit checkbox. Finally, you did not give an edit summary: please use them. If you have questions, please feel free to ask here or on my talk page. If you would like help with your edits, please let me know. Cheers! DoctorMatt (talk) 03:56, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have been studying RLC for my entire career and I believe you are mistaken. I understand why you believe RLC (rlc) is standard form but at the next event of the council of teachers and mathematicians and Acousticians, changing RLC to rlc is on the agenda, I made my edits so I would not forget at the time of the meeting I will not forget before my agenda is full. Good day Doctor matt.

CParis Mathematician Cparis2300 (talk) 16:27, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you can provide citations, you could argue for the change to rlc. Please discuss this on the article's talk page before making these changes again. Cheers! DoctorMatt (talk) 18:52, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Non-photo blue. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 16:49, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea how to remove the link I added to cabbage. Wikipedia gave me a notification and said "Keep going on editing" so I had to do something. Cparis2300 (talk) 16:52, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This defies common belief. You have now again intentionally re-added it. And also added a nonsense entry to Cabbage#See also. Stop right now. It's trivial to close a browser window if you cannot find a 'cancel' or similar button. DMacks (talk) 16:54, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk) 17:57, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Your disrespect toward me defies common belief, the audacity you have saying I lack common knowledge is indeed trivial. Saying I intentionally added it is ostentatious.

I have the honor to be, your obedient servant. Cparis2300 Cparis2300 (talk) 14:12, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]