User talk:Cp1955
|
Regarding your edits to Writer and South America
[edit]Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:00, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Regarding your edit to Chicago Cubs
[edit] This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:05, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Re: I am a teacher in California
[edit]Re your message: Please do not vandalize Wikipedia in order to prove your point to your students. As a teacher, you should know better than to vandalize a source that may be unreliable. You don't have your students vandalize out of date encyclopedias or books in your library, do you? Instead, just teach them that Wikipedia may not be the best source for your students to use as an only source. See Wikipedia:Researching with Wikipedia and Wikipedia:Academic use. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:20, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- Also, you COULD just search around looking for examples of edits to prove your point. We unfortunately have many vandals here that you could use as an example. Here's one case: [1]. -WarthogDemon 05:27, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- If I may add something here, what you're doing is disrupting wikipedia to make a point, which is not allowed. If you're looking for examples of vandalism to show your class, you can go to the history of almost any page and find examples that have been reverted.
- For example, go here and check out the last sentence under "Personal Life." [2] That's obviously something you can't use in a research paper.
- Take care! Redrocket (talk) 05:29, 1 April 2008 (UTC)