User talk:Cozyenby/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Cozyenby. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Re: Anarchopedia
I would suggest taking the article to Deletion review. The article has a long deletion history, and frankly, I've had very little to do with it. Cheers. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:54, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Deleted version
Hello there Samer.hc, you may find the requested content at User talk:Samer.hc/Sandbox now. Please understand that deleted content cannot stay for too long in userspace, so it's important that you edit and improve the article in your sandbox as soon as you can, then submit the content for consideration at WP:DRV. I hope this helps. Best wishes, --PeaceNT (talk) 13:56, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
- Hello again, I notice it's been over a month since you last edited your sandbox page. Please be aware that deleted content cannot be stored permanently in userspace; it only stays providing significant improvement is made there. Thus I'm afraid you're given only another week to do what you intended to with the sandbox. If you don't, the page will have to be deleted; you can of course store the content offline so that you'll have it available when you have time to improve it later. Best wishes, --PeaceNT (talk) 11:07, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Mozilla Drumbeat
Notability is demonstrated on Wikipedia by the presence in the article of independent reliable sources about the topic. It's not enough to assert that the topic is "growing in importance" on an administrator's talk page after the page has been deleted; actual sources, such as newspaper or magazine articles about the site, are required in the article to demonstrate how that's true. You're always free to work on a sandbox version in your own userspace if you wish, but there have to be both sources and a credible claim of notability (not just "this thing exists", but "why is this thing important, what specific things has it accomplished, etc.") in the article before it can be moved back into articlespace. Bearcat (talk) 22:46, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
December 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your comments, which you added in discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Leakspin. Please note that on Wikipedia, consensus is determined by discussion, not voting, and it is the quality of arguments that counts, not the number of people supporting a position. Consider reading about the deletion policy for a brief overview for the deletion process, and how we decide what to keep and what to delete. We hope you decide to stay and contribute even more. Thank you! Beeblebrox (talk) 00:12, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
Because you love the kittehs
DarTar (talk) 15:27, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In Ourproject.org, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Valencia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Barnstar
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation. |
Disambiguation link notification for April 23
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Kune (software) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Mailman, Free Culture, AGPL and Dropbox
- Comparison of social networking software (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Kune
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Spring Breakers may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Besides, there is a "scene of gender reversal via firearm fellatio"<ref name="spring-policymic">{{cite magazine|url=http://www.policymic.com/articles/31425/spring-breakers-review-this-is-not-what-a-
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:40, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Your draft article, User:Samer.hc/Move Commons
Hello Samer.hc. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Move Commons".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|User:Samer.hc/Move Commons}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hasteur (talk) 16:52, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Move Commons (2) (February 2)
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Move Commons (2).
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .
contributions to Wikipedia!
- Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Disambiguation link notification for March 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Comparison of open-source software hosting facilities, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Free culture (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Move Commons (2), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Move Commons (2)
Hello Samer.hc. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Move Commons (2)".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Move Commons (2)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:02, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
The article Joan Subirats has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. GABHello! 22:21, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Samer.hc. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Samer.hc. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)