User talk:Cozy1298

Writing issues

We don't use point form (bulleted list) to write article.

Secondly, for abbreviation, either all dots or no dots. I.e. Calcio Femminile Dilettantistico should be either CFD or "C.F.D.". However, since Italian use dots apparently , as well as consistent with A.C. Milan, dots should be used. But, since the club more commonly refer as "Mozzanica Calcio Femminile", as well as C.F. was ambiguous (may means F.C., football club, or club de fútbol), better leave the name in full form.

Lastly, we don't usually use bold text except the article title. Matthew_hk t c 13:29, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing, c&p the title of the news article and do not make up a hoax title for them. Also |website= or |work= (which are the same parameter with italic text output) is different from |publisher= (usually the company or the organization) Matthew_hk t c 13:32, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2022 Supercoppa Italiana (women) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2022 Supercoppa Italiana (women) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 Supercoppa Italiana (women) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Dr Salvus 14:04, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women's Supercoppa Italiana

If you don't believe as I do, discuss at WT:FOOTY and seek a consensus. Dr Salvus 14:15, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss at WT:FOOTY. I've stopped reverting and I ask you doing it too. Please collaborate with us and discuss. I've arleady opened the threat. Dr Salvus 14:22, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Your recent editing history at Juventus F.C. (women) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
I've arleady opened a treath at WT:FOOTY. Stop edit warring and discuss there Dr Salvus 20:08, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Sophie Roman Haug

Hello, Cozy1298,

Thank you for creating Sophie Roman Haug.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

What is needed are references from significant coverage about this player, and not their own words; in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. Lists, Team rosters, pages listing matches and results, databases, Instagram, Facebook, none of these are reliable sources. (There have been changes to the notability guide for sports - see WP:NSPORT ) You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 09:56, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alva Selerud moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Alva Selerud, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:56, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Alva Selerud has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alva Selerud. Thanks! Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:57, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alva Selerud (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TheChunky were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alva Selerud and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 19:08, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cozy1298! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 19:08, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alva Selerud has been accepted

Alva Selerud, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:45, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]