User talk:Cowrampage

September 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Forward pass has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Forward pass was changed by Cowrampage (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.94211 on 2014-09-07T14:02:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:02, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Forward pass. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Jacona (talk) 14:05, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Orange juice with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Hallows ^AG (talk) 14:07, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Wood has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Wood was changed by Cowrampage (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.9705 on 2014-09-11T15:26:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:26, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mr. Freeze has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mr. Freeze was changed by Cowrampage (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954658 on 2017-03-29T14:45:59+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:46, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have reported this false positive and added a source to the article. Thank you for your contribution, and I hope you stick around to do more. Argento Surfer (talk) 15:44, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ★Trekker (talk) 14:07, 31 March 2017 (UTC) Trekker i am using correct sources for the article and giving credit to a recognized creator.[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mr. Freeze. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Chaheel Riens (talk) 14:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. TimothyJosephWood 14:30, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Mr. Freeze. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 14:33, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:53, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]