User talk:Count of Monte Wiki
Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)
Hello, Count of Monte Wiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
- Be Bold!
- Learn from others
- Be kind to others
- Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
- Tell us a bit about yourself
- Our great guide to Wikipedia
If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}}
on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains(talk) 01:13, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
Kakocracy
[edit]Hi, thanks for this article! Unfortunately, we have an article on this concept already under the title kakistocracy. I've converted the article into a redirect-you're welcome to use your text to expand that article. Your text has not been deleted and is accessible here if you'd like to retrieve it.
If you feel that kakocracy is the most correct title for the kakistocracy article (I'm not taking a position here as I'm not a classicist), one option would be to open a move discussion–that link goes to a guide to how to do this. Blythwood (talk) 01:32, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Eranove) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Eranove.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
The article currently uses phrases like
Emerging Capital Partners, a pan-African leader in private equityandwith the ministry, an innovative program to facilitate...which are promotional without providing any real information and should be edited out with respect to neutrality.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
signed, Rosguill talk 20:26, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 15
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Domus Aurea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Panther (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Blanche Merrilll
[edit]May I point out that none of your "NOP"s are original research, but are taken from the words of the texts that were used. There is no original point of views in that article. - kosboot (talk) 15:16, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- I want to register my strong disagreement with your removal of so much information, much of which is your subjective opinion. There is no other source of information on this person. - kosboot (talk) 20:33, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Kosboot: Hi, while I understand your concern, I believe it is fair to say that the article is excessively detailed and over-reliant on show reviews and critics' commentary, which offer at best oblique information on the subject. Furthermore, if there is no other source of information, then perhaps Blanche Merrill does not meet the notability requirements? However, I will refrain from removing more information from the page for now. Let me know if you have any suggestions on how to move forward. Best,Count of Monte Wiki (talk) 17:23, 23 April 2020 (UTC)