User talk:Council of chiefs

The article Lottery League 2008 has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:37, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Given that you added sources to the second version of the article, I agree that it shouldn't have been subject to speedy deletion the second time. (I deleted the first version, but a different admin deleted the second.) I've restored the article. I suggest you find any other sources you can and add them. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 20:15, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lottery League 2008

The article Lottery League 2008 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable music event. The only sources are minor local coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.Rorshacma (talk) 20:14, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]