User talk:Cottonmother

Welcome!

Hello, Cottonmother, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! --Edcolins 20:08, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Anadish Pal

I've nominated the article Anadish Pal for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Anadish Pal satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I have explained why in the nomination space (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anadish Pal. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of Anadish Pal during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion. --Edcolins 21:08, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As the original contributor of the article, I have done my best in my limited time to gather sufficient references. I illustrated the inclusion of persons like Shikhar Dhawan into Wikipedia. Even otherwise, the India section has very few Indians who represent India in any significant way. The efficiency of the experienced Wikipedia editors is remarkable, however they are requested to have a wide-angle view of a cross section of articles in Wikipedia: Cottonmother 14:10, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let the biographied chap grow younger! Ok, let us remove any allusions to his date of birth! When I meet him, I'll ask him to show me his passport!! -- Cottonmother 17:56, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

== Image:TOIstory.jpg listed for deletion ==

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:TOIstory.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. —P ilotguy (ptt) 17:40, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:TOIstory.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:TOIstory.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 07:28, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image move

Just to let you know, I moved your image of Anadish Pal to Commons. Once the local file is deleted, the version at Commons will be accessible to all Wikimedia projects. Thanks for licensing the image freely under GFDL! Please send any response to my talk page. ~ ωαdεstεr16_«talk^stalk» 05:14, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Death of Pearl Gupta

An article that you have been involved in editing, Death of Pearl Gupta, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Pearl Gupta. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 05:02, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Bviairflow.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:38, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bviairflow.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bviairflow.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:27, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Your recent editing history at Gravitational wave shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 13:42, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Cottonmother reported by User:JohnBlackburne (Result: ). Thank you. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 16:32, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I request all the users involved in the discussion to kindly read the talk page of the article in question. User:Cottonmother

September 2017

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Gravitational wave. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Specifically, accusations of vandalism and ganging up are inappropriate (and unsupported). The reporting of your violation of 3RR was appropriate and done in good faith. Deacon Vorbis (talk) 17:47, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I just reminded you of using extreme expletives involving generally-unmentionable body parts; and objected to such usage. The other fact that the rapidity of 4 or so editors congealing to get into a managed edit war was suspicious enough to be pointed out. It is not a personal attack on any of you. It is the criticism of your approach belied first by your use of expletives without reason. Hope, everything settles down; and we refrain from using such expletives (even if they are somewhat allowed by Wikipedia). Ganging up is not unsupported at all, the time stamps of the edits show it all. First, all the 350 or so editors are oblivious for 2 months and then a dozen or so from one region show up as piranhas, indeed. Why aren't the other editors objecting to my edit of 12 July 2017, besides the group of adamant deleters? Hope, others too have a comment or two to make. User:Nihlus Kryik on the article's talk page is already accepting the entry of the patent link in the main article in a creative manner. WP:Patent only objects to un-granted patent applications being produced as references. The patent in question is serious, granted, and maintained. User:Cottonmother — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cottonmother (talk • contribs) 21:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A couple things. First, as I've already explained to you, "my ass" is not an "extreme expletive", nor are asses unmentionable (here's one dictionary's definition which doesn't even bother marking it vulgar). However, your objection to that is not why I left the warning on your talk page. You're failing to assume good faith on the part of other editors and throwing around language that implies that we're in cahoots. We are not. You've also made accusations of vandalism. See WP:NOTVANDALISM for why this is inappropriate. Finally (and this should really be on the article's talk page instead of here, but it's short so I'll just keep going), you should double-check the history at Gravitational wave. The IP edit in question, here was vandalism (probably), and TwoTwoHello's reverting of it was routine, and by no means an endorsement of your previous addition. The vandalism edit added 4 characters of gibberish and had nothing to do with your previous addition. I even already pointed this out to you before but you're still making this claim. --Deacon Vorbis (talk) 13:53, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Now going by your non-vulgar "mentionable" usage standards of your ass as well as my ass, the respective "swollen" buttocks have reached an extremely shitty point of repetitive exhaustion. Cottonmother (talk) 04:37, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Cottonmother. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anadish Pal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anadish Pal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anadish Pal (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 04:11, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anadish Pal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anadish Pal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anadish Pal (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ∯WBG^converse 10:46, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cottonmother. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cottonmother. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Electromagneticengine.jpg

The file File:Electromagneticengine.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]