User talk:Cosmohypotheses

This is Cosmohypotheses's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cyberdog958 was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Cosmohypotheses/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

cyberdog958^Talk 06:56, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cosmohypotheses! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! cyberdog958^Talk 06:56, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quantum Coupling Hypothesis. (December 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Quantum Coupling Hypothesis. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 22:25, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cosmic Self-Organization Hypothesis (December 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cosmic Self-Organization Hypothesis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 23:00, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Layered Universe Model (December 5)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Spiralwidget was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: I would like to elaborate on this strong response to this article creation attempt. This is clearly referring to one of Maxwell's Four Cosmos Hypotheses, which appears to me as someone with formal education in physics to be a qualitative hand-waving explanation for certain JWST findings which does not have any scientific merit, basis, justification or qualification, and the eponymous Maxwell Starwhisper is clearly a pseudonym attempting to use the name of James Clerk Maxwell to promote their book. I do not want to see this material here. What is this theory even saying- we know already that the different scales of the universe interact, and that the larger scales are composed of components with smaller scales. What is the new idea here? Why are these random references to Dark Matter formation tossed in here like a reference salad? In my opinion, this article is a pseudoscientific neologism that should not be given the credibility of a wikipedia article, and that is why this is a Reject rather than a Decline.

Spiralwidget (talk) 02:10, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quantum Coupling Hypothesis. (December 5)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Spiralwidget was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: The response below is copied from my response to the Layered Universe Model draft, but is equally valid here. I would like to elaborate on this strong response to this article creation attempt. This is clearly referring to one of Maxwell's Four Cosmos Hypotheses, which appears to me as someone with formal education in physics to be a qualitative hand-waving explanation for certain JWST findings which does not have any scientific merit, basis, justification or qualification, and the eponymous Maxwell Starwhisper is clearly a pseudonym attempting to use the name of James Clerk Maxwell to promote their book. I do not want to see this material here. In my opinion, this article is a pseudoscientific neologism that should not be given the credibility of a wikipedia article, and that is why this is a Reject rather than a Decline.

Spiralwidget (talk) 02:21, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cosmic Crystal Hypothesis (December 5)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Spiralwidget was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: The response below is copied from my response to the Layered Universe Model draft, but is equally valid here. I would like to elaborate on this strong response to this article creation attempt. This is clearly referring to one of Maxwell's Four Cosmos Hypotheses, which appears to me as someone with formal education in physics to be a qualitative hand-waving explanation for certain JWST findings which does not have any scientific merit, basis, justification or qualification, and the eponymous Maxwell Starwhisper is clearly a pseudonym attempting to use the name of James Clerk Maxwell to promote their book. I do not want to see this material here. In my opinion, this article is a pseudoscientific neologism that should not be given the credibility of a wikipedia article, and that is why this is a Reject rather than a Decline.

Spiralwidget (talk) 02:27, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quantum Coupling Hypothesis (December 5)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Spiralwidget was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: The response below is copied from my response to the Layered Universe Model draft, but is equally valid here. I would like to elaborate on this strong response to this article creation attempt. This is clearly referring to one of Maxwell's Four Cosmos Hypotheses, which appears to me as someone with formal education in physics to be a qualitative hand-waving explanation for certain JWST findings which does not have any scientific merit, basis, justification or qualification, and the eponymous Maxwell Starwhisper is clearly a pseudonym attempting to use the name of James Clerk Maxwell to promote their book. I do not want to see this material here. In my opinion, this article is a pseudoscientific neologism that should not be given the credibility of a wikipedia article, and that is why this is a Reject rather than a Decline.

Spiralwidget (talk) 02:29, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Potential Conflict of Interest, attempt to place non-notable scientific concepts on Wikipedia

Hi Cosmohypotheses, I would like to ask you politely to stop trying to publish the articles related to Maxwell's Four Hypotheses onto Wikipedia. There are several reasons why; firstly, the book itself is not notable, so it is audacious to attempt to make articles for the concepts within the book. The book is not notable because it has not received any reviews, has no discussion in reliable independent sources and therefore does not have any standing to be made into a Wikipedia article. The concepts discussed within the book are not backed up with peer reviewed publication, and the author is not recognised or notable in their own right (Maxwell Starwhisper). I do not have a copy of the book, but my initial impression is that the concepts themselves range from unoriginal to being too broad to disprove to being truly outrageous as someone with formal education in Space Physics. I have therefore to dismiss such claims as being pseudoscientific and relying partially on Maxwell's (James Clerk Maxwell's) name to convey a degree of legitimacy. The references are not relevant to the articles, in fact discussing things that are completely different and that do have their own articles, such as Quantum entanglement and Dark Matter. Good luck in promoting your book to people without a formal scientific education, but these things do not belong on Wikipedia. If the book becomes notable, someone may make a new article for it. However, it is ambitious to pass it off as a serious scientific publication unless the reception from qualified cosmologists is significantly more positive than I expect it to be. Spiralwidget (talk) 02:41, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]