User talk:Cosmetor

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia , I hope you will like it here and decide to stay.

You may want to take a look at the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.

Here are some links I've found useful:

Also: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your username and the time after your comments. Signing with three tildes ~~~ will just sign your username.

I hope to see you around Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page!

Johann Wolfgang [ T ...C ]

04:57, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

"Antagonists" category

Outstanding work being WP:BOLD enough to move them into the "antagonists" category. "Villains" is such an unprofessional and POV term; "antagonist" is the proper and encyclopedic term, and you did/are doing a huge favor to the encyclopedia with this one. Thanks. — Deckill er 02:44, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It appears what you did was a result of a CfD nomination. Unfortunately, that is not the time to unilaterally rename the category; you should leave a suggestion/vote on the page, or wait until afterward, as per the CfD guidelines. — Deckill er 06:23, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leaving aside our disagreement over the issue

If in future a similar disagreement should arise, please don't try to solve it by emptying out categories that are up for deletion. The CfD notice on the categories clearly explains that the categories are not to be emptied. Assuming that consensus is to merge the old "villain" categories and delete your new "antagonist" categories a lot of extra work will now need to be done. Otto4711 03:27, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

help us Cosmetor, you're our only hope

I noticed that you had voted to keep the category of Fictional Characters by Superpower on the march 7th CFD. Just in case you didn't yet notice, Raidant!'s decision to listify them was put up for review, and another vote started on the 14th. It seems those of us in favor of keeping the categories are losing the debate, and I was hoping you could lend your voice once more so we can keep them --Piemanmoo 20:10, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Magic system for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Magic system is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic system until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 00:05, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]