User talk:Corporatetaichi
A tag has been placed on Corporate Tai Chi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Corporate Tai Chi and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Schuym1 (talk) 03:06, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Shuym1: I don't know if your edit is before or after Nihiltres edit. I am so confused about where to place ((hangon)). It took me so long to navigate to write the article in the first place.
Corporate Tai Chi is 10 years old. People in corporate fitness programs are using it, but it is not written about. Very few studies about corporate tai chi. I am trying to have one Federally sponsored. Those that exist are listed in the article. There are not a lot of people whose mission it is to get this information out to the people. That's why I wrote it.
Since this is a newly studied and validated field, I am one of the people writing about it. I am trying to educate the public about it since it has such striking effects on corporate team building.
I have 6 relevant studies at the bottom of http://www.onetaichi.com/corporatetaichi.html that have nothing to do with me. I can list them separately.
Experts write articles. If the expert wrote about the new discovery or new technique, of course, the expert must be quoted. In this case, there are a few people talking about Corporate Tai Chi, but they are only talking about what they do, not trying to inform people.
The pages I have listed are informational, even though some of them were written by me. My mission: to inform so that people can know the benefits of corporate tai chi and use it to save the economy, people's minds, a balanced way of life. This has nothing to do with my getting work.
http://onetaichi.com is a referral service for students and teachers. I am listed as the contact but I can anonymize the contact info on the site if you require it.
Dr. Lin is an expert. World Tai Chi Day has nothing to do with me and is a resource the world uses for info and health info on tai chi/chi kung. Are these references a problem?
Thanks for your help with my first try.
Diane
Corporatetaichi (talk) 15:48, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Corporate tai chi appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you.
AfD nomination of Corporate tai chi
[edit]
I have nominated Corporate tai chi, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corporate tai chi. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Blowdart | talk 05:57, 27 December 2008 (UTC)