User talk:Coronationstreetfan16

Coronationstreetfan16, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Coronationstreetfan16! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Coronation Street characters (2011), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. – JuneGloom Talk 01:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Owen Armstrong, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Refusing to correct own spelling errors, correcting structure to make sense, adding too much information on other characters storylines - need i go on... Rain the 1 19:32, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You improve the article. You have no intention of doing so though. You made so many mistakes on Beth Tinker I really think basic editing is not for you.Rain the 1 15:44, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{Tmbox | style = background: #f8eaba | image = | text = This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Drwho16 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Coronationstreetfan16 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made this account because I wanted a Fresh start. I did not edit any Doctor Who articles using this account and have no intention of doing in the future. The accounts I made to edit Dr Who have been blocked and are no longer in use so I am not using this as a Sockpuppet account. I only created this account after reading up on fresh starts and as far as I am aware what I have edited since making this account does not violate any wikipedia rules.Coronationstreetfan16 (talk) 21:14, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That is not the way it works. Your block applies to you personally, not to any one specific account. Creating a new account (of which you appear to have at least nine) while you are blocked is block evasion, which is not allowed. You must apply for unblock at your primary account.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:53, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Coronationstreetfan16 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

will this account ever be unblocked and if I tell you about other sock puppet accounts will that work in my favour.

Decline reason:

You created new accounts six minutes before making this request. Quite hard to assume good faith. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 23:53, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Maybe and definitely yes. Daniel Case (talk) 21:50, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]