User talk:Corgidad101

Corgidad101 (talk) 08:35, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Corgidad101! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Dylan620 (talk) 04:49, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Choosing appropriate sources

Welcome to Wikipedia and nice attempt on your first article, Matt Walsh (political commentator). Please consult the Wikipedia document Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources for notes on the various sources you have used in the article. For example, Gawker and New York Post are not appropriate for using on a Wikipedia article of a living person. Fox News may not be appropriate (depending on how you used it). Same with Daily Beast. You might be able to find another source to swap for any that aren't appropriate. Please check the list of perennial sources and modify your article accordingly. Platonk (talk) 05:25, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm writing to clarify what I said in this summary, because WP:PSTS is a policy that can surprise new editors. WP:PSTS says, "Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published secondary sources and, to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources and primary sources. Secondary or tertiary sources are needed to establish the topic's notability and avoid novel interpretations of primary sources. All analyses and interpretive or synthetic claims about primary sources must be referenced to a secondary or tertiary source and must not be an original analysis of the primary-source material by Wikipedia editors." In the Walsh article, the Patch story describing Walsh's school board appearance is an independent WP:SECONDARY source, which is what Wikipedia articles are based on. The Patch story holds much more WP:WEIGHT than a TV appearance that includes Walsh, which is a WP:PRIMARY source, or a tweet, which is a WP:SPS (self-published source) and is often discouraged for use. Llll5032 (talk) 08:20, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I requested WP:SECONDARY sources for the first Career paragraph because they are needed for a neutral summary of his career. Analysis of primary sources can verge into WP:OR (original research), which we are not supposed to do. Llll5032 (talk) 08:30, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, IMDB is an unreliable source per WP:IMDB Llll5032 (talk) 17:52, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]