User talk:Cord stand 123

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Qmptsk (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

December 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at 2AM (band). Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 05:23, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Cord stand 123, all the teasers news/sneak peek, and anything that I removed are excessive details that are not encyclopedic. Instead of reverting my edits, please see how you can copyedit/improve the article any further. Thanks.

PS: @Dr.K.: thanks :)--TerryAlex (talk) 05:31, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]