User talk:Coralizzie1

This is Coralizzie1's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edaphobacter aggregans has been accepted

Edaphobacter aggregans, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Dan arndt (talk) 02:39, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm an accredited new article reviewer and therefore I have the ability to approve or reject articles. Reviewers must:

Have a Wikipedia account at least 90 days old
Have a minimum of 500 undeleted edits to articles
Have thoroughly read and understood the reviewing instructions
Have a good understanding of the policies mentioned in the reviewing instructions, including the various special notability guidelines
Review solely on a volunteer basis. Soliciting or accepting payment for a review is prohibited.

If you need more information check out Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation. Dan arndt (talk) 03:06, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not exactly certain what you are exactly asking. I'm presuming that it something to do with the edits I made before approving the draft? Dan arndt (talk) 03:17, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay that makes more sense. I simply looked at other similar articles, such as Edaphobacter modestus and imported the format from that article (i.e. Infobox, scientific classification and taxon identifiers). Obviously I checked to make sure that the links/sources were all correct before adding them. There is not automated bot that I am aware of that does that for you - its all manually done. I hope that helps - happy editing. Dan arndt (talk) 03:36, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you need more technical assistance, you might want to check out Wikipedia:WikiProject Microbiology and post any queries on the relevant talkpage. Dan arndt (talk) 03:42, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Acanthopleuribacter pedis has been accepted

Acanthopleuribacter pedis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Dan arndt (talk) 07:08, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Coralizzie1, welcome to Wikipedia! I'm glad to see another editor interested in microbiology! We could use many many more hands around here. If you have questions getting started, or are looking for places to help, please let me know! You can respond to my message on your talk page here, or post on my talk page. Glad to have you on board! I hope you decide to stick around. Happy editing! Ajpolino (talk) 15:03, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Coralizzie1, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Coralizzie1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Holophage (January 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Holophage and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Holophage, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 20:31, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Holophage (January 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Need more context. When and how was it discovered? Where does it exist?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Holophage and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Holophage, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Acidicapsa ferrireducens has been accepted

Acidicapsa ferrireducens, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Ajpolino (talk) 22:36, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blastocatellia has been accepted

Blastocatellia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Ajpolino (talk) 22:45, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Holophage

Hello, Coralizzie1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Holophage".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 18:12, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]