Jump to content

User talk:Coradia175

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, JamesSteamPacket, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Mjroots (talk) 09:24, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Northern Rail

[edit]

Can I ask why you removed referenced information regarding capacity of trains? With a lot of cascades expected in the short term future I added that about a month ago so that people could compare capacities between different trains and I've had positive feedback from some people since doing it. With the way you've edited it, it implies the 144s and 158s are all the same which they are not - some are 1 carriage longer than others. To me it makes no sense why you removed that referenced information and left in the non-referenced information regarding which routes trains operate on which route. 85.199.229.158 (talk) 11:56, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lady of Mann

[edit]

Re this edit you made - the intention is good, but it has removed relevant info from the infobox. Ports of registry should all be kept, as should owner and operator info. Also, GT and GRT are not the same, both should appear in the infobox. Do you feel confident enough to fix this so that all relevant info appears in the infobox? Mjroots (talk) 09:28, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. As the ship has been renamed, an article move may be in order. Mjroots (talk) 10:08, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
For an uncontroversial move, you can be bold and move the article yourself. In this case, WP:RM would probably be a better option. Re the IoMSPCo article, it appears to be just one IP that is the problem. I'll be leaving a message once I've checked that IPs contributions. I don't think it is necessary to protect the article at the moment. Should this become a problem in the future, please request temporary semi-protection at WP:RPP. Mjroots (talk) 10:14, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've left the IP a note about WP:MOS and WP:MOSSHIP. I'd rather believe the problem there was a lack of knowledge about these policies than any deliberate attempt to vandalise - beginner's mistakes as it were, which are allowed. Mjroots (talk) 10:26, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The article on Lady of Mann could really do with some structure - lede, description, history etc. I've reworked the {{Steam Packet Ships}} template to give better links to the redlinked articles. Some of these will need amendment if articles get created due to renamings whilst in IoMSPCo service. If you're feeling adventurous, you could try creating articles on all ships (it can be done, see the {{Seatruck Ships}} template). Mjroots (talk) 11:14, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There's a fair bit on the net, such as Simplon Postcards, Manxlink and Clydesite. Another useful source of info is Plimsoll ship data for all vessels on Lloyd's Register in the period 1930-45. Further suggestions for sources here. Mjroots (talk) 13:13, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You moved this page, without any discussion here that I can see.
I’ve moved it back; perhaps you would care to explain why this page needs moving? Xyl 54 (talk) 00:31, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PS: the “someone” who “keeps saying” the article should be at Lady of Mann is me, I suspect. I think I said it once, in October last year.
And as the suggestion you were given was to take it to WP:RM, maybe you should do that...Xyl 54 (talk) 00:37, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I thought this might happen. The best option now is a WP:RM, and to notify WT:SHIPS so that a number of interested editors may have the chance to express their opinion. I can see the arguments on both sides, although I generally lean towards using current name for active ships. Mjroots (talk) 11:07, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Isle of Man Steam Packet Company

[edit]

I see you've also had a go at correcting the false info in that article. One question - whats the source for the scrapping of "Monas Queen" this year? Reason I ask is that according to this page on Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/12487973@N02/3319115108/ she was broken up in 2008. I realise Flickr is hardly a valid primary source, just wondered what the truth was! Cheers Jon Olddemdike (talk) 17:52, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bus Vannin

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bus Vannin, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. –92.39.201.36 (talk) 08:53, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:L1v3rp00l

[edit]

I've given this editor warnings about the three revert rule and ownership of articles and said to raise issues at the article talk pages in future. Should the warnings not be heeded, I would suggest raising the issue at WP:ANI, and ask that User:L1v3rp00l be placed on a restriction preventing him from reverting your edits. Mjroots (talk) 06:39, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ship articles

[edit]

Just a note to say that when creating ship articles you should add the ship the the relevant list of ship launches (and shipwrecks if applicable) - this helps to prevent an article being orphaned. Also, it is useful to create redirects from the non-prefixed title (e.g. Seatruck Power) . Finally, if you move a ship article, please remember to check the article for redirects (using the "what links here" feature in the toolbox) and retarget any existing redirects, otherwise you have a double redirect. These little chores help keep things running smoothly. Mjroots (talk) 03:20, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited MV Derbyshire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kawasaki (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on your userpage

[edit]

"Places I have visited on the Isle of Man" - dude, seriously, if you live here then that is a hilariously silly section, it's not as if it's very big. I've been to five of the places on your list today just through work, shopping and marshalling the GP*!

Although if that is the entire point then bravo on your silliness Egg Centric 21:12, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

*And also colby, ballabeg, ballasalla, cooli, santon and the mountain road. Have you considered adding these reknowned worldwide locations to your list?

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blackpool Transport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dennis Trident (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jurby Transport Museum, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages SELNEC and Leyland Titan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Isle of Man Railway locomotives, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Museum of Science and Industry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Impera, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Brighton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:21, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bus Vannin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dennis Trident (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stagecoach Merseyside - possible merge

[edit]

Hi James, I have started a merge discussion re Stagecoach Merseyside, and thought you may like to take part, since you have made a recent relevant edit to the article.

Best wishes, Quackdave (talk) 22:59, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014–15 Sheffield Wednesday F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page José Semedo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited British Rail Class 156, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saint Edmund. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome

[edit]

Thanks for the message. You're very welcome. I was a bit baffled, to be honest. But they are doing some other stuff I don't really get either, and sooner or later they'll probably sort themselves out or get sorted out by an admin. The former, I hope. Cheers DBaK (talk) 19:12, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015–16 Sheffield Wednesday F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Valley (stadium). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015–16 Sheffield Wednesday F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tommy Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Half Barnstar
Thanks for actually backing me up on the issue regarding match reports. I tend to only stick to my team's article (Fulham), so I wasn't sure if this was just a Fulham thing or something that should occur everywhere. Spa-Franks (talk) 20:32, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015–16 Sheffield Wednesday F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ben Gibson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Meetups in Liverpool and Manchester

[edit]
See you there?

Hi there! Do you know that there will be meetups in Liverpool on the 27th of September and in Manchester on the 25th of October?

We have sent you this message because you signed up at meta:Meetup/Manchester. If you would rather not receive such messages on future, please remove your name from the list.

Yaris678 via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:51, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Honorifics in lists of politicians

[edit]

Hi Coradia175. Since you've edited one or more of List of current members of the British Privy Council, British Government frontbench and Official Opposition frontbench in the last six months, I'd like to invite you to a discussion about the use of honorifics in those lists. The discussion is happening here, and I look forward to a helpful and robust discussion. DBD 21:05, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help us improve wikimeets by filling in the UK Wikimeet survey!

[edit]

Hello! I'm running a survey to identify the best way to notify Wikimedians about upcoming UK wikimeets (informal, in-person social meetings of Wikimedians), and to see if we can improve UK wikimeets to make them accessible and attractive to more editors and readers. All questions are optional, and it will take about 10 minutes to complete. Please fill it in at:

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/JJMNVVD

Thanks! Mike Peel (talk) 17:10, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Arriva Rail North Article

[edit]

Hi Coradia175

Thank you for the amendments and for coming back so quickly. I have just noticed that there has been further amendments on other pages relating to Northern Rail made that are incorrect. Here is the source page for the Department of Transport. Would it be possible for you to amend the below pages as well? If you would like I can ask if user:redrose64 would he be happy to make those amendments as per your suggestion if that is what you would prefer.

The pages with the incorrect information are:

In future operations section on the Govia page it says Govia applied and did not win the Northern Franchise tender. This decision has still not been made as no operator has been chosen yet.

On the page Arriva UK Trains under the future section there is a sentence that says Arriva have won the Northern Franchise. This is incorrect. Would it be possible to remove this sentence as the franchise has not been awarded to any operator yet.

The following pages I believe have been redirected incorrectly:

Govia Northern Limited

Abellio Northern

Previously both of these pages were directed to Northern Rail and now are directed to Arriva Rail North. I believe that they should be redirected to their original destination of Northern Rail for accuracy unless you disagree.

I am happy to discuss further.

Thanks

Eoinsandford (talk) 18:01, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015–16 Sheffield Wednesday F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Price. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Next meetups in North-West England

[edit]

Hello. This is just to let you know that the next wikimeets in North-West England will take place in:

Please sign up on the relevant wikimeet page if you can make them! Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:12, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015–16 Sheffield Wednesday F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bordesley. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015–16 Sheffield Wednesday F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slovan Bratislava. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2015–16 Sheffield Wednesday F.C. season
added a link pointing to Mark Hudson
Adwick railway station
added a link pointing to Bentley railway station

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016–17 Sheffield Wednesday F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ryan Bennett. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016–17 Sheffield Wednesday

[edit]

Hello, I noticed you have reverted back to your original way but to keep up with season consistency matches should not be in the "Overview" section and they should be found in the "Competitions" section in the correct competition matches are competed in. Can you please revert your change back please.

--Skyblueshaun (talk) 15:01, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

They have been changed to a month by month basis in the matches section. If it is all one section then it becomes more difficult to edit as the season goes on because of the increasing size of the section. It is far easier to add in the league match results in smaller sections (such as month-by-month) rather than one very large section that covers the whole season - Coradia175 (talk) 15:27, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016–17 Sheffield Wednesday F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ronaldo Vieira. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016–17 Sheffield Wednesday F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steven Fletcher. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Coradia175. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Coradia175!

[edit]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Absolutelypuremilk (talk) 17:35, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited British Rail Class 195, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ZF. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Coradia175. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Allerton TMD (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Stobart Rail
Kirkdale TMD (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Kirkdale

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited British Rail Class 319, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Long Marston (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Warrington's Own Buses, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St Helens (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Coradia175. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Coradia175. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Allerton TMD, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Allerton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Manchester meetup 36 - 9 June 2019

[edit]

As you attended one of the previous two Manchester meetups and/or expressed an interest in being notified about future ones, this is a heads-up that I have started organising a meetup in Manchester on 9 June 2019 - details are at m:Meetup/Manchester/36. Please feel free to invite others with an interest in Wikimedia/Wikipedia to join us. Thryduulf (talk) 23:10, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TfW Rail article - fleet images

[edit]

Hi Coradia175,

Thanks for changing the fleet table back to the "normal" layout - I'd never have been able to do that myself.

However, what's your reason for deleting all of those images...? Fair enough with the only one image of each class of unit, but with the 153 for example, why did you delete the TfW liveried one and keep the ATW liveried one...?

Then there's the future fleet section - your theory seems to be that a photo of nothing is better than a photo of a 195 to represent the Civity, a 755 to represent the Flirt and a 399 to represent the Citylink. However, it's apparently OK to keep the photo of the prototype 230 to represent the D-Train, but a photo of an actual TfW 769 to represent the Flex isn't allowed...?

I'm intrigued, and looking forward to hearing back! Anamyd (talk) 19:31, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


@Anamyd: I'll try and answer you as best as I can.

I've restored the TfW liveried Class 153 image, that was a mistake, so I apologise.

I deleted the images of the 195, 399 and 755 because it hasn't been confirmed what TfW Rail's units based on these platforms will actually look like. Despite the Class 195 and 196 units being based on the same platform, they aren't identical. Also, renders of TfW's DMUs show they will have gangways, which the 195s don't have. On the other hand, all Class 230 units are identical (excluding the livery), so in my opinion it makes sense to use a photo of any Class 230 unit.

I deleted the image of the 769 because it's side-on view of one of the driving cars.

Cheers - Coradia175 (talk) 20:03, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

142033

[edit]

Hi Coradia175,

I noticed that the Class 142 article now claims that TfW has a fourth "spare parts" 142, the one in the subject line. This is the first I've heard of this; what is your source please...?

Anamyd Anamyd (talk) 01:54, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]