User talk:Coquinet

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... I made my first edit recently and shortly thereafter my edit was undone. These notes were indicated - OR, primary sourcing. I've done some preliminary reading, trying to get up to speed, but I'm wondering if a little one to one might be a better way for me learn the right way to successfully make my addition to the page. The info in the lawsuit section of the Danni Ashe page is out of date and I would like to update it. Can you see my post or should I paste it in here? Thanks for your help!

Coquinet (talk) 23:32, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Coquinet Hi! Your edits were reverted on the basis of primary sourcing but also because statements like this: Though neither party has released a public statement, court documents show the case was closed January 30, 2017. This suggests an out of court settlement, one agreeable to Ms. Manzari. are not encyclopedic and require reliable sources, especially involving legal matters. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 23:37, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... So what I'm really asking is how do we update a page when the only source of info is primary, as in the court documents that tell us the current situation? Thanks for any help, and if possible please respond in plain english (it's hard for newbies like me to understand the jargon (primary source, not encyclopedic) you experts are so familiar with)

Coquinet (talk) 15:21, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, which article are you talking about? If you could tell us, this will help us answer your question. Thanks. Seagull123 Φ 16:52, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, this is definitely a discussion that should be held on the talk page of the article in question. Primefac (talk) 16:59, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]