User talk:Coq Rouge

Welcome!

Hello Coq Rouge, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --MPerel ^{( talk | contrib)} 22:24, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Pink Floyd

(From User_talk:Paranoid_Eyes, User_talk:Floyd(Norway) and here)

Hey. Stop undoing the article on Pink Floyd. If you check the year, it says 1996. It was in 2006 that Waters attended by satelite. I tried to notify you in the changetext. Coq Rouge 18:09, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the main reason I changed it was the fact that I saw a lot of red words removed and a grammatically wrong sentence in the changed text. So my hand went automatically to the undo button. To be honest I do not know when and how did Waters attend. --|[ParanoidEyes]|-- 18:24, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

:-)That's OK. I'll correct it again. But as I said, Waters did not attend in 1996. But, he did attend by satelite in 2006. Coq Rouge 18:26, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it was in 2005 Waters attended by satelite. Floyd(Norway) 13:43, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Details ;-) Anyway: it was definitly 1996. Ha en god dag :-) Coq Rouge 15:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi,

Can I just ask why you added another {{hangon}} sentence to User talk:Webbmyster when it was already included in the {{nn-warn}} template I'd placed above, was there a problem? Cheers muchly ^Khukri 17:18, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just to inform him about it so that he wouldn't remove the {{db-bio}} tag, but instead followed the rules Coq Rouge 17:19, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah OK I didn't realise it was for removing the tag, my mistake. Anyway I have to go out for a couple of hours, I've given him a {{uw-speedy2}} as he removed the tag again, and has been up to other mischief. Could you keep an eye on him please. Cheers ^Khukri 17:25, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will definitly keep an eye on him. Feel safe, that page will be tagged for speedy deletion as long as I am here today :-) Coq Rouge 17:28, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

an FYI for you

Thought you would like to know...as an active member of the Pink Floyd project. Currently a rather arrogant POV editor (with VERY poor writing skills) has attempted a hijack of the Led Zeppelin article. The editor(editing as an IP also) has been rv'd and the article temporarily semi-protected. He seems to have set his sights(perhaps as a vendetta) on purging the current FA status'd Pink Floyd article and reducing it to a fancruft page similar to his attempts on the LZ article. I have 2 admins watching over him but it will take due diligence by regular editors to maintain the current status of these "target" articles. The editor attempted to blank most of the Pink Floyd lead-in section which I rv'd. Perhaps you could rally some of the regular Pink Floyd editors/project members to try and quell any of the pending "quality kill" that the article may be facing. I can direct you to the Admins who are eyeing this situation should you require any assistance and I am not around to see what is going on. Good luck. 156.34.142.110 17:42, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Coq Rouge. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Coq Rouge. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Coq Rouge. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]