Jump to content

User talk:Coonman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


April 2015

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:28, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Winkelvi. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Amy Poehler because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- WV 02:50, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Joss Whedon. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- WV 02:52, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Joss Whedon. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- WV 02:56, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The SpongeBob Movie: Sponge Out of Water. Diff: [1] No indication from existing, sourced content that the SpongeBob sequel uses traditional animation. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:54, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]