User talk:Coolpat222

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Tedickey (talk) 09:16, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Tedickey (talk) 20:28, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tedickey (talk) 11:14, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Attacks in the article Thomas Ford Brown

Warning

Please do not make personal attacks as you did at Thomas Ford Brown. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adrianwn (talk • contribs) 07:53, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks??? If Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks why are you allowing an attack on my family to be posted like we-sorts? That's a personal attack on my family and a lie!!!!!!!!

No, neither you nor your family is directly or indirectly mentioned in the article, hence it is not a personal attack. – Adrianwn (talk) 05:25, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your message

Hello. I'm afraid I don't know what your message is about. Perhaps you've confused me with another editor? — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 18:54, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The whole we-sorts entry is a personal attack on my family. My people NEVER claimed we sort of indian. We are indian (native american). Whoever posted that put their opinion by what they think. You cant tell a persons nationality or race just by appearence. The entry we-sorts is derogatory and offensive. Can the entry be deleted?

I'm sorry, but we don't delete encyclopedia articles because they offend readers. Why not improve the article? — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 20:10, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you lieing? You do especially when its a personal attack and its a personal attack on my family. You surely did delete an entry before but you wont delete this offensive entry about my family. Why the double standards???? DELETE THE ENTRY!!!!!!!

Look. I don't know who you are, but the article doesn't mention you or your family. This is the last response you will receive from me. Goodbye. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 07:01, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you read or what -- It said Proctor, Newman, Savoy, Queen, Butler, Thompson, Swann, Gray and Harley. 1 of those is my last name and others are family members. That isnt a reliable source. Thats someones opinion. They NEVER said we sort of Indian. They always say they are indian. How can a non indian determine who is indian? We have always said WE ARE NATIVE AMERICAN. NOT SORT OF so that is offensive as calling a black person a coon or nigger. You can't find 1 native american espcially with the last names of Proctor, Newman, Savoy, Queen, Butler, Thompson, Swann, Gray or Harley writing or calling themselves we-sort or we sort of native american. Only whites and blacks call Proctor, Newman, Savoy, Queen, Butler, Thompson, Swann, Gray and Harley we-sorts. Just like you wont find a black person calling themselves a coon or another black person that. We-sorts is as derogatory as coon is and it they were made up by other races. The term coon was used in books before but i dont see it on wikipedia talking about black people like we-sorts are talking about native americans. Why the double standard?

Reverts

Take your issue to the discussion page. Tedickey (talk) 15:55, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have no issue. Seems like you do. Why do you keep changing what I post when it was approved by Jimmy Wales - the founder and chairman of wikipedia?

It is in fact currently at that version. Take issues to the discussion page Tedickey (talk) 17:09, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Tedickey (talk) 17:09, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Its not fact -- i showed the research that was done that showed wesorts is a derogatory name just like nigger is. It was like that till user Brownby changed it. Go back and look.

We-Sorts

Dear Brownby and Coolpat222,

I am going to now insist that neither of you edit the We-Sorts article until you have had a constructive discussion on the talk page of the article. This discussion should be thoughtful, respectful, and seeking compromise. It simply will not do for the two of you to keep fighting and reverting on the article--Jimbo Wales (talk) 07:56, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about Jimbo? I changed it back to exactly what you wrote. Just go back and look at my last edit. Brownby has been writing all kinds of crazy stuff.