User talk:Cooljuno411/Archive 5

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Smile

Sorry, I got a bit carried away. I think you have clearly earned a smile:

siℓℓy rabbit (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, Go on smile! Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Re: Template talk:Sexual orientation

Mr Juno, I don't have a horse in this race (so take this as unsolicited advice from a fellow wikipedian), but edit warring (even with advance warning lol) is not the most productive way to get what you want on Wikipedia. WP uses consensus, not voting, for content disagreements. Do what you can within the consensus of the tribe, and file the rest under WP:DGAF. Otherwise you'll just end up being on ANI more and eventually getting blocked. This is not a threat, just an observation. (shuts up now and goes on my way......) :-) Outsider80 (talk) 00:36, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Dome

It seems you misunderstood my objections for to adding the fellatio dome to the DAB page, and whether or not I'm able to verify by google if someone uses the term is totally irrelevant. If you look at WP:NEO you'll see that the term will only pass inclusion to the article if backed up by WP:RS, which it currently isn't. If you bother to take the article through its steps and source it well, it may stay, but if not it will be removed when someone motivated takes notice. MURGH ^disc.

Spongebob and Asexuality???

Are you 100% sure that spongebob would qualify for asexuality? You are aware that the article is devoted to the sexual orientation, right? Spongebob does bud as referenced in one of the episodes, but that only makes him aseuxal reproductive, not asexual as in orientation; he does like Sandy afterall. There must be a mix up or a mis-communication. I am asexual and have had a hard time making people believe me in being so... They think it refers to asexual reproduction, which is not my case (that is biologically impossible). It is awfully hard to find fictional asexuals because most characters in fiction will not reveal their orientation. I will say that I highly disagree with Spongebob being asexual; I think the creator meant that he buds. (Tigerghost (talk) 15:51, 17 February 2009 (UTC))

Well what the asexual article lacks is the clear distinction between the 3 types of asexuality. (1)asexual reproduction, (2)asexual sexual orientation, as in not wanting intamacy, sex, etc., (3)and asexual as in lacking just the desire for sex, such as a heterosexual or homosexual who is a relationship but does not want to have sex. I will be sure to make an edit that distincts the differences.--cooljuno411 22:08, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Actually there is a header at the top of the article that reads, "This article is about the sexual orientation in humans. For the form of reproduction, see asexual reproduction." So the distinctions are made. (Tigerghost (talk) 16:29, 19 February 2009 (UTC))

Still not distinction between sexual orientation and people who still engage in relations but not sex.--cooljuno411 23:18, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Is that a clear distinction, or more a continuum? Are there any references that address it? Aleta ^Sing 23:23, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Not a continuum.... as i said above.... 3 distinct forms of the term "asexual". Please continue all further talk about asexual on the asexual talk page (in the sub-section i started : ]--cooljuno411 01:39, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Gender neutrality and good grammar

The word "themselves" is plural. If you want to use it for gender neutrality, then plural subjects and verbs need to be used with it for number agreement. Gender neutrality needs to be grammatical as well. Aleta ^Sing 16:49, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of IMac/docs/iMac (Intel-based)

A tag has been placed on IMac/docs/iMac (Intel-based) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Shawnpoo (talk) 21:21, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of IMac/docs/iMac (Intel-based)/Aluminum iMac

A tag has been placed on IMac/docs/iMac (Intel-based)/Aluminum iMac requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Shawnpoo (talk) 21:21, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of IMac (Mid 2007)

A tag has been placed on IMac (Mid 2007) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jenuk1985 | Talk 21:52, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of IMac (Early 2009)

A tag has been placed on IMac (Early 2009) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jenuk1985 | Talk 21:59, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of IMac/iMac (Intel-based)/Aluminum iMac

A tag has been placed on IMac/iMac (Intel-based)/Aluminum iMac requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jenuk1985 | Talk 22:00, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of IMac/docs/iMac (Intel-based)/Aluminum iMac/iMac (Early 2008)

A tag has been placed on IMac/docs/iMac (Intel-based)/Aluminum iMac/iMac (Early 2008) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jenuk1985 | Talk 22:00, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Marijuana Control, Regulation, and Education Act

Please do not undo the edit I made. I did not add any unsourced material--I simply did some linking, punctuation corrections, and other minor edits. There is no reason to remove the contributions, as they follow wikipedia standards. Thanks! Looking forward to seeing this article expand. --Another Believer _(Talk) 01:53, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Did not removed content from your edit.... or did not intend to.... removed recently added, unreferenced, content.... Did not intend to remove links to articles you made....--cooljuno411 [sign my contact archive] 02:00, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

March 2009

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Marijuana Control, Regulation, and Education Act, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Eugene Krabs (talk) 17:34, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

You must not understand the situation. A person added unreferenced material, and i removed it because it's UNREFERENCED. And you keep reverting it. I am not "test editing"....--cooljuno411 [sign my contact archive] 20:33, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Non-monogamous heterosexual marriage

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Non-monogamous heterosexual marriage, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. LetsdrinkTea 22:11, 12 March 2009 (UTC)