User talk:Coolcoolmen16

Spice Girls

Please do not add the "Tabloid and Press" section back to the Spice Girls article. Another editor removed it a few days ago with good reason; it is poorly worded and unencyclopedic. The article should focus on the Spice Girls achievements, not tabloid fodder which is usually false and has no place in Wikipedia. Thanks. Pinkadelica (talk) 20:15, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Girls Aloud discography. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Forums are not a reliable source. Please do not re-add any sales figures without an official source to back it up with. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 20:33, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wannabe

The United World Chart page has no links that supports or states how they do or make those charts and countings. It is allegedly produced and hosted by a German company called "Media Traffic", and a quick Google search on the company turned up no evidence that it is widely used or trusted. Plus the article was deleted from Wikipedia because no third-party sources could support its notability.

Frcm1988 (talk) 07:50, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bad charts

Please do not add the United World Chart, any Filipino chart, or any other chart listed in WP:BADCHARTS, to any Wikipedia article, as you did here. If you want to remerge those rows that were merged, I won't stop you, even though I wish you wouldn't: it makes removing charts more difficult.—Kww(talk) 18:13, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

semi-protection

Just putting the semi-protection macro into an article doesn't really do anything. It puts the picture of the lock on, but IPs can still edit the article.

If you really want to semi-protect an article, you have to request it at [[WP:RFPP}}.—Kww(talk) 20:02, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Nm prince 070628 ssh.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Nm prince 070628 ssh.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 03:00, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:35738 lg.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:35738 lg.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Damiens.rf 16:04, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Forever (Spice Girls album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to BPI

Spiceworld (album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to BPI

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:42, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of best-selling girl groups for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of best-selling girl groups is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of best-selling girl groups until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:55, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You were right about the sales.

My problem is with the 4 millions sold,seems not to be real,also the link to MTVLA seems to be exaggerated, esmas is not an relianle site too. But,I will not change. Tthe link to Arrasando I put on the Thalia's article a long time ago...--88marcus (talk) 02:40, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of best-selling girl groups, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Too Much. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spice Girls

If you believe Para Ti is reliable, you need to post it at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. I personally could not find any information on the said magazine. For the time being I'm replacing it with Billboard which has only Platinum for Argentina.--Harout72 (talk) 15:37, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Para Ti" Magazine is from the editorial "Argentine Televisa", Televisa is the most realiable sources in Latin America. For something logic, The 1997 edition is not complete full view, but the preview said in spanish: doble platino en la Argentina con 140.000 unidades. Is not easy found the sales from 80's or 90's albums from countries like Argentine in internet, that source said the exact sales. Hope you change again. Coolcoolmen16 (talk) 15:40, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think we'd better stick to Billboard as it's clearer.--Harout72 (talk) 16:32, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nena (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FAC input

Hi! Since you're a regular contributor to music articles, would you be interested in commenting or reviewing my FAC for the article xx (album)? It's received one editor's comments but not much follow-up yet, so anything would be appreciated. Dan56 (talk) 03:39, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of best-selling girl groups

Hi, as you created this article in the first place, I assume you have been following the discussion on the talk page about it. Personally I think it is a bit of a mess and very difficult to keep accurate, but as a first step we have decided we are going to combine the physical and digital sales lists, as it makes no sense to separate them and it is impossible to say how many sales of, for example, the Spice Girls are physical and how many are digital. I think there should also be a cut-off limit of at least 10 million sales in order to qualify for the table, because below this level it becomes more difficult to find accurate sources. Do you have any comments to make about these suggestions? Richard3120 (talk) 17:25, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, I'm baffled by your recent edits to the US albums sales figures. I know about those figures from Yahoo Music and the rest, but those are clearly just the Nielsen SoundScan figures – once you add in the sales from music clubs that's what takes them up to the figures that match the certifications. So actually the lower figures aren't the true sales. Richard3120 (talk) 03:06, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Coolcoolmen16. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Coolcoolmen16. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Coolcoolmen16. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Coolcoolmen16. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of best-selling girl groups page is being controlled by a user named Richard3120

This guy has been editing the information about the Spice Girls' and Andrew Sister's respective sales. According to Billboard, the Spice Girls sold more than 85 million records worldwide. On the other hand, the Andrew Sisters sold 80 million. Richard keep on editing the sales and claiming that the latter sold more than 90 million records because The Washington Post wrote an article about it in 2014.

Billboard's latest figure for Andrew Sisters was in 2013, which states, "They recorded more than 400 songs and sold over 80 million records, several of them going gold (over a million copies)." Meanwhile, Billboard's latest article about the Spice Girls states, "Formed in 1994, the Spice Girls have sold more than 85 million records worldwide, making them the most successful female British pop group in history."

Billboard is more reliable than The Washington Post when it comes to tracking sales. Richard is not listening. He keeps on undoing our edits to fit his narrative. Can you block him from editing the article? Thanks.