User talk:Cool it down
My mission is to target page deletions by vandalists & restore them
|
Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:03, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
April 2008
[edit]Cool it down (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
i am surprised to be blocked as i merely undid the constant attempts at deleting whole sections without valid reasons in the Hogenakkal integrated drinking water project http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hogenakkal_Integrated_Drinking_Water_Project & hogenakkal pages by those (only 2 users i.e, ganeshk MaximvsDecimvs) who want to blank the wikipedians on the truth on HOGENAKKAL & ITS DRINKING WATER PROJECT ..see that references in those pages & links to the pages are valid..see also the history of the pages relevant to hogenakkal....Please do note that those two have not given valid reasons references to delete content on 'bangalore project vs hogenakkal project' section of the DRINKING WATER PROJECT article..
Decline reason:
That still doesn't excuse your violation of Wikipedia:Sock puppetry. Since all editors may only use a single account to edit any single topic, your request to have this account unblocked is denied unless you wish to cease using User:Mysure instead. You can have one account or the other, but not both. -- Netsnipe ► 16:59, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ok netsnipe, i shall ensure that "mysure" does not access my ip address. but i hope you warn me before taking drastic actions & if "my sure" surfaces again on the ip address that i use..so please unblock considering that my arguments for unblock are valid otherwise..Cool it down (talk) 17:04, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
- Give up. No administrator (including myself) is going to believe that Mysure and this account belong to two different people. -- Netsnipe ► 17:08, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Your 'belief' does not solve it..so , i request yo to disable 'my sures wikipedia user account if need be..why block mine if my justifications for undoing potential vandalism/ spammers is valid? Please dont use 'haste' to block & 'delay' to unblock!!!..Cool it down (talk) 17:13, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Cool it down (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
original reason to block itself is not justifiably correct..see arguments to know the truth...other deficiencies pointed out by netsnipe also rectified ..so why the delay in unblocking!?!!?!
Decline reason:
You have not addressed the reason for your block, which is violations of WP:SOCK. — Yamla (talk) 17:40, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
?!?!..injustice/ atleast different rules for different people (compare with ganeshk 's frre run of erasing referenced truth]!Cool it down (talk) 20:05, 6 April 2008 (UTC)