User talk:Cool Blue/Archive 3
I see you've requested a peer review for Kentucky. Please add the notice of the new peer review on the article's talk page. Interestingly, W.marsh and I have just been discussing in the last couple of days how to improve the article to GA or FA status. Seems you've beaten us to the punch on requesting a new peer review. We would love to have your help, especially as this would be a huge coup for WikiProject Kentucky. Let's coordinate our efforts and get this thing done! Thanks again! Acdixon 18:09, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for posting some suggestions for the article Kentucky at WP:PR. Also, I noticed that you'd made a comment on the culture section. Well, now, the culture section somehow ended up towards the bottom of the page, below the references section, and it does not show up when you try to edit it. Could you try to see what's wrong with it, because I can't find the source of the problem. Thanks again for the suggestions, and good luck editing. Cool Bluetalk to me 00:25, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Sorry but I didn't seem to have a problem opening that section for editing. Perhaps it was reverted? You might check the history tab on that page to find out. — RJH (talk) 14:37, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- Well, it doesn't appear to be there anymore, nor does it show it on any archived version of the page. But the whole thing was filled with software malfunctions when I read the page. It might have been my computer, or the software might have been malfunctioning. Anyways, thanks for reviewing the article, and reviewing the problem. Cool Bluetalk to me 00:21, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
It could have been a problem with Wikipedia's back-end MySQL database. Sometimes Wikipedia just gets a little flakey. Usually it gets cleared up, but I suspect a DBA is probably resetting (or restarting) something in the background. — RJH (talk) 15:36, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 |
|---|
| 6 November 2024 |
|
Wikipedia edits
[edit]I am aware that i have i high count. However, i keep feeling worried over the nuerous word association edits. Probably minus 900 edits or something and there is the real count. Do you think i would be okay? Thanks for the nom btw. I will think about it. Simply south 14:39, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- Ok. I think i'm good in other areas. Strangely i am a regular on WP:RM and i am involved in numerous transport projects, on of which i am trying to manage slowly but surely. I also like being interactive
- There is another thing that is worrying me right now. It is just it is coming up to my uni exams soon. So i may not be so responsive. Simply south 14:49, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
possible decision
[edit]- Well thank you for the gesture but i think i am still going to turn this down, or can this RfA be postponed for about 20 days? Simply south 15:18, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you. That'll be the end of my end of year exams. Should i accept now or then? Simply south 15:32, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
- Or maybe it could be placed again? What exactly do you mean by speedied in this case? I would prefer the full 5 day Simply south 17:08, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
- Oh i see. Simply south 17:16, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Re: Kent Simpson AfD
[edit]I wrote that message just before I went to work so didn't have time to look through the guidelines on AfD's thoroughly, so didn't realise I could withdraw my submission. I would have, but there has been another opinion of Delete and a "Weak" keep since I commented, so I'm going to let democracy run its course and see what happens :) I do contend the idea that the person is notable, so I'll let others decide what they want to do with it. Mentality 21:53, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
RE: Revision Of Kent Simpson
[edit]Thank you for your effort in keeping the article for Kent Simpson. Even though there is some international speculation whether or not the World Hockey League is professional (participants get paid funds for living and are technically 'paid athletes' which is deemed to be professional by the United States,disallowing all WHL players to apply to or be schooled in U.S. colleges) wow, that was a big sidetrack, regardless, what I was saying was even though there is speculation, so it's hard to know whether or not he is professional or just a top amateur, I definitely believe that he is an outstanding player and deserves a nod from Wikipedia. Although us Canadians don't live in Igloos or eat seal blubber (for the most part) we do make some stereotypes ring true and the most of which is our love for hockey. Thanks so much for, if you wanted to you could say, catering to this article and I'm glad Wikipedia allows things which I definitely think are notable to be articles. Thank you again, very much. Antmayfield 23:05, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Bmader
[edit]Okay Jake. I just wrote two full length articles on the "Elder Scrolls IV:Oblivion" and "Runescape". On the one about runescape, i didn't re-post the same article I had already created, i made a new one. Yeah.Bmader 16:11, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Re.
[edit]Just deleted revisions, not oversighted ones, dear Cool Blue :) Phaedriel - 11:46, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- Also, I think not even oversighters can get back oversighted revisions. Will (is it can be time for messages now plz?) 12:28, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- Easy way to tell us apart: Wimt's sig has a red subscript text, I always have a blue superscript text (I've been using "Will" in my sig for ages too). Will (is it can be time for messages now plz?) 12:35, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
User:Jhfireboy/Admin Opposer Thanks
You wrote:
Yes, I know that it's supposed to be reported at WP:UAA, but until WP:UAA is officially recognized as a notice board, WP:AIV can still be used. I'm not going to revert, but please respond to my talkpage.
- Well, yes, that is true I guess, but, I had already reported that guy to WP:UAA. --24.136.230.38 13:09, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Patsy Moore
[edit]Actually, User:Steel359, who put the semi-protection on it, told me that he has no intention of unprotecting it any time soon. I'd only requested two weeks, but the vandalism was so egregious that he felt he had to leave it protected longer. Blueboy96 14:21, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Re: Name
[edit]I'm backed up on Wikipedia work to do, but I was just sort of wondering where your username came from. Cool Bluetalk to me 13:58, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- Areopagitica? That's what I thought it was :) Majorly (hot!) 14:11, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- The origin of my username. Thanks for the interest! (aeropagitica) 18:46, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
[edit] 
|
Thank you Cool Blue, for voting on my RfA. Although it failed, I will try to improve in the ways pointed out to me, and maybe I will become an admin next time. If you have any comments, questions, etc., you know where to go. ¿SFGiДnts! ☺ ☻ 22:30, 6 May 2007 (UTC) |
User report
[edit]I'm sorry I misinturpereted that usernames with sex or sexy were nessesary inappropriete.--U. S. A. 22:41, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
How exactly do I change it?Sistersboy 23:29, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Pornchai
[edit]It's a common given name in Thailand, with multiple examples even on Wikipedia. -- Ben TALK/HIST 03:37, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 7th, 2007.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 19 | 7 May 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:59, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Yup, my typing is terrible tonight :O) Flowerpotman talk|contribs 22:50, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- (reply) It was just by chance I clicked the Mendel article on Recent Changes. Yeah, I thought you were having your hands full with him, so I decided to go fo a 4im. :O) Flowerpotman talk|contribs 22:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
TFD
[edit]Hello. I need some way to file a report so a template can a get a deletion. However I'm not sure whether or not TfD would be the right place for it, because the template is a userbox that does not begin with the Template: in the URL. It can be found here. Thank you! Cool Bluetalk to me 22:31, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- You could always try with MFD for Wikipedia and user pages. CG 14:32, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Out Out at AfD
[edit]Hi, I see you took the article Out Out to AfD. However, I'd assert they meet WP:BAND under criterion 5 - they've been released on Metropolis, who are a major indie label in the USA.
Also, the article may be badly written and very POV, certainly, but it was created just 3 minutes before you took it to AfD. I'm wondering, why didn't you tag it with cleanup or notability instead? If the poor noob who created that page decides to never come back to Wikipedia because his article was AfDed 3 minutes after creation, how does that help you build a community here? AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 03:42, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, the original "Out Out" article, which was created 4 months ago, was a poem by Robert Frost. I went through the logs and looked at it. But the new guy just recently created the band article, and 3 minutes later you AfDed it. The new guy's since been blocked, because he chose an offensive username. In any case, you assert non-notability, but the article states the band had several releases with Metropolis, which satisfies WP:BAND. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 20:45, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- I agree, the article right now is badly written, but the fellow who created it did admit he just copied their bio. Perhaps it's better to have a stub than what's there now, I'd agree with that. Anyway, one person in the AfD debate has already volunteered to clean it up if it's kept. Problem solved. BTW, my only issue with this was the quick-trigger AfD. If the article had been here a year, I'd have been in favour of deletion too, just because of its low quality. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 20:52, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Sounds good. It's at the point where we can't really assume good faith of him. Phony Saint 19:38, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
AfD on Canton Country Day School
[edit]I've just responded to your request on WP:RFPP regarding edits to {{afd}} - nothing needs to be done to the template - you just need to substitute the afd template when adding it. Hope that helps :-) Ryan Postlethwaite 23:12, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- The Canton Country Day School article has been substantially rewritten to address your concerns, and information regarding notability supported by reliable and verifiable sources have been added. You may want to revisit the article in light of these changes. Alansohn 16:10, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 14th, 2007.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 20 | 14 May 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:19, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Tagging
[edit]Hi
I wasn't in the process of tagging, but because I have recently added a template that I created to all the tourism articles called world tourism, I have all these pages on my watchlist. So I could actually see a trail of recently tagged pages that are in the nav box. So I thought i would join in for A while. When I saw what was happening I suspected that someone found the template and was using that to find all the different articles. Thanks AdamJWC 00:51, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- You just tagged the place that I work at. AdamJWC 00:57, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- You guessed it. Sorry I couldn't pitch in a bit more, i am at work at the moment. I have to train staff, serve customers, accounting and Wikipedia at the same time. Thanks. AdamJWC 04:15, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Prod
[edit]Could you please explain why you think that Smash (song) is worthy of an article. My reasoning is sound, it is a non-notable song. The only information on the article page states that it is the last song on the album and it is the longest song. Then a bit of trivia regarding it. There is no further scope for the article. Before removing the prod, maybe you should consider expanding the article to make it worthwhile. If the article remains in its current state without improvement, then I will list it on AfD. Nouse4aname 15:03, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
If you wouldn't mind listing it that would be great. No inconvenience caused. I just don't see why so many songs have their own article when they don't deserve them! It's my new mission to find pointless ones like that and get rid of them! I wonder if there's a group...Cheers. Nouse4aname 15:22, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
WP:ABUSE
[edit]I've been asked by the user E to ask some folks to comment on his proposal to create an archival bot at WP:ABUSE. I know you have done work there so you probably have an idea whether its good or not. Would you take a look? Thanks. JodyB talk 20:52, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
<font=courier>
- Hey, thanks. I am not sure exactly what he has in mind but he's working on it now. STarting a project eh? We just started on for Alabama about a month or so ago. It's a lot of work but quite rewarding. JodyB talk 21:41, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Removing Proposal
[edit]Thanks for recognizing the problem and reverting the proposal. That is clearly an honorable and conscientious move. --Kevin Murray 14:46, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Edit Day
[edit]
|
Happy First Edit Day, Cool Blue/Archive 3, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! |
Politics rule 00:43, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
| HAPPY FIRST EDIT DAY! | from the BIRTHDAYCOMMITTEE | |
|---|---|---|
  Wishing Cool Blue/Archive 3 a very Happy First Edit Day! Have a fantastic day! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee | ||
Arnon Chaffin Got a message? 13:58, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
| HAPPY FIRST EDIT DAY! | from the BIRTHDAYCOMMITTEE | |
|---|---|---|
|
Wishing Cool Blue/Archive 3 a very Happy First Edit Day! Have a fantastic day! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee | ||
--DestructoTalk to me 03:39, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Ohio city User Templates
[edit]I just wanted to give you a friendly reminder that I been making some improvements on the Ohio city templates like Dayton, Ohio, Canton, Ohio and Mansfield, Ohio. I made a redirect on Template:User canton because the letter c (in canton) should be a capital C in Canton. You did a nice job on the Canton, Ohio user template. I would have to say thanks in part to your hard work. Cheers, OHWiki 02:56, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 21st, 2007.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 21 | 21 May 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:03, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
SHDCLLT
[edit]I am the author of SHDCLLT. I am new to posting pages on wikipedia and still havent quite gotten the hang of it. My friend and I have came up with a party game/drinking game that I believe would be fun for people to play. I didn't make the wikipedia page as a promotion for myself, just for the game so that other people in the world could enjoy it as well. Before it is deleted, I would appreciate advice on how to edit this page to make it look more legit. I was trying to link it to "drinking games" and "party games" but as I stated before, I am still not used to posting articles. Please e-mail me at [removed] if you have any suggestions as to how I could edit the page to allow it to stay up. Thank you.
So in order for me to post a page on this site about a game developed for fun, I would first have to wait for it to be recognized by an outside source such as a newspaper, magazine, or other website that I am not affiliated with? If so, then I ask how my page is different from Bullshit (drinking game) which cites no outside source besides its category drinking games. I understand that this game is already an established and well-known game. Would I just have to edit the drinking games page to have Shdcllt added to the list?
Re:Hamilton
[edit]I didn't. I removed the redirect to "Hamiliton". For some reason someone redirected "Talk:Professor Hamilton" to "Talk:Professor Hamiliton". I removed the redirect, but realized that there was info there. So I went back and grabbed that and pasted it on the right page. Apparently, someone just redirected information instead of "moving" the article to the corrected title. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 20:49, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- No problem. I realized how confusing it was going to look in the history, but had I paid attention the first time it probably would have looked better. Then again, had the page been moved instead of redirected it would have all been fine..lol. Anyway, no harm no foul. Thanks for the concern though. Happy editing. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 20:52, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Food and Drink
[edit]I saw that you recently joined the Wikiproject Food and Drink and I wanted to welcome you. I have been working on restructuring the main page for the project and getting together some tasks for the group to concentrate on. I will post some ideas on the project page for members to peruse and decided if they would like to assist. Looking forward to reading your contributions. In particular what about European cuisine do you find fascinating?--Christopher Tanner, CCC 23:52, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Haricot Vert in French Food
[edit]Haricot Vert is a specific type of French green bean you are right, so maybe we need to put something under green beans about haricot vert as it is not just a generic string bean as the green bean article is mainly related to.--Christopher Tanner, CCC 00:15, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Bmader
[edit]Can you check out the article I wrote about Stardust? You know, check it for errors and anything that would cause it to be deleted? If you do, go to the website en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stardust Elements.
- What does that mean, and what do those issues mean?User: Bmader
- And one more thing, can you check for a certain Wikiproject Space? Idon't think there is one. User: Bmader talk
- I posted the hangon template on my article and am prepared to debate my article. I found almost all of the information from our school science book at the end of chapter. The actual title of that section is elements form stardust. So keep me posted about the article.````
- Another one more thing. Wher is the template for Wikiproject Space? Ican't find it.
- I posted the hangon template on my article and am prepared to debate my article. I found almost all of the information from our school science book at the end of chapter. The actual title of that section is elements form stardust. So keep me posted about the article.````
- And one more thing, can you check for a certain Wikiproject Space? Idon't think there is one. User: Bmader talk
You around?
[edit]I need to ask you something. --Whsitchy 05:30, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Give me a minute
[edit]Need to check something, alright? --Whsitchy 18:10, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Renames and edit counts
[edit]Re: [1]. Renames are performed regardless of user's edit counts. Its only for usurpations because we want to make sure the target accounts are made good use of that there is a requirement for users to be established. Thanks anyway for lending a hand, WjBscribe 00:37, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
SHA-1
[edit]User:Hairchrm/sha1 - Hairchrm 02:36, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 28th, 2007.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 22 | 28 May 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:59, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Chocolate reference removed
[edit]On 2007-05-26 you made this edit to the Chocolate page with the comment "removing unneeded and eyesore reference in header". While I totally agree that the reference in the header was an eyesore, I would like to have the source listed as reference -- Cocoa and Chocolate: Their History from Plantation to Consumer. Since this article uses footnote references, I didn't know where to include it as it was my source for the information in that section. (I think you are saying that since the information I added is not controversial, it doesn't really need to cite a reference.) Should it just go in the "Further reading" section? (I'm just slowly getting started editing at Wikipedia, so thanks for your patience.) --Ishi Gustaedr 14:00, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
RFA
[edit]I will think about it. Also i find it rather humourous that it says "she". I prefer they but from the message i think you can tell that i'm not she. Nice try though. :P Simply south 21:17, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
- I noticed you are offering nom to simply south. Would you mind letting me co-nom? --Tλε Rαnδоm Eδιτоr 00:45, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'll go for it. Simply south 18:22, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
- Please can you NOT add this yet as i think i may want to refine my answers but am not going to have time tonight. Simply south 19:02, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
- I already co-nommed. --Tλε Rαnδоm Eδιτоr 20:14, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
- Not really sure what to put but i have tried to be honest in my answers. I am going ahead with transclusion. Simply south 20:18, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
- May withdraw as am starting to feel uncertain about whether i am experienced enough and if it was a bit too early. Maybe i should wait til later....10:00, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- I have withdrawn due to a variety of reasons and that there was no consensus. Thank you for the original nom, much appreciated. Simply south 20:22, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
RfA
[edit]I'd just like to inform you that I've replied to the questions raised in my RfA. Best wishes/ Pax:Vobiscum 10:36, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 4th, 2007.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 23 | 4 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:08, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Battle of Midway
[edit]I saw your declined request for protection, perhaps you'd like to add your voice here: Wikipedia talk:Main Page featured article protection#Consensus? DrKiernan 12:40, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Just a note
[edit]I've declined your speedy deletion request of User talk:Eliecerps [2]. Quite simply, it doesn't matter if the talk page is in Spanish. The userpages for my Latin and Spanish Wikipedia accounts are both in English, primarily because that's the only language I speak; I have those accounts so I can properly address issues I come across, but otherwise, I leave them alone. This could very well be a similar issue. EVula // talk // ☯ // 04:25, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
User page note
[edit]I fixed it. Thanks Taprobanus 13:08, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Comment
[edit]Will you please give me a diff? Thanks:)--James, La gloria è a dio 19:37, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
James, La gloria è a dio has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
SWFanon
[edit]He is a disruptive user i know in real life. His alternate accounts appear to be blocked, though. I'm just tagging them to keep track of his misbehavior. George V.
I added a comment to your changed-to-strong-oppose comment. I can hardly imagine how the understandable irony in IvoShandor's very civil comment could be confused with "sarcasm, incivility, and [harsh, offensive?] tone". —AldeBaer 14:01, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
From: Justinmacintyre Why would I be banned for editing my own user page. Wow. Yes I am vandilising my own page thanks.
Socks
[edit]OK. Got them both. IrishGuy talk 01:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
</font=courier> </font=courier>
Just so you know...
[edit]Just so you know, User:66.169.15.21, who you had recently warned, blatantly vandalised your userpage; I reverted it for you. If you are an admin, you may want to block him (I hate running it through AIV). If not, I gave him a {{uw-vandalism3}} notice. Cheers! --tennisman 02:49, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
[edit]Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage. Kariteh 07:52, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 11th, 2007.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 24 | 11 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 02:20, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
The IP should be caught by an autoblock, and User:Dilatedracoon doesn't exist, and therefore can't be blocked. --Akhilleus (talk) 18:46, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Your comment is showing up as a double vote because the analysing tool recognises the first userlink (Katalaveno, in this case) as the commenting user. Also, here's a idea for formatting your comment, so as to keep the indent and you appear as the commenting user:
- Weak Oppose - Per Katalaveno and per these stats:
Wikipedia:
*3 Categories for deletion/Log/2006 May 23
*3 Categories for deletion/Log/2006 May 11
*2 Categories for deletion/Log/2006 May 17
*2 WikiProject Football
*2 Categories for deletion/Log/2006 May 10
*2 Templates for deletion/Log/2006 August 11
*2 Barnstar and award proposals/New Proposals
Almost all of an admin's work is connected to the Wikispace somehow, and these do not inspire me. But your heart's in the right place, work hard in the mainspace, and wikispace, and you'll get there in no time. It's great that this user wants to help out in the mainspace. But, I really don't see why an admin from Papua New Guinea would help us function better. Cool Bluetalk to me 21:07, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Regards, —AldeBaer 22:16, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
| RfA candidate | S | O | N | S % | Status | Ending (UTC) | Time left | Dups? | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Worm That Turned | 199 | 2 | 2 | 99 | Open | 09:47, 18 November 2024 | 5 days, 7 hours | no | report |
Here's the link to the RfA analysis tool. It still can't attribute your (indented) signature to your comment, and therefore interprets it as an unsigned comment. However, you don't have to reformat your comment, I'm only asking you to consider doing so because I'm one of the users who use {{Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard/RfA Report}}. Remove the template at will, I just wanted to illustrate how parsing errors show up. —AldeBaer 18:01, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Nevermind. —AldeBaer 18:05, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
It still shows up as a parsing error on the analysis page, here. —AldeBaer 18:08, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- Same as your comment at Max Naylor's RfA, here. —AldeBaer 18:11, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Just a quick question...
[edit]If an image in a Wikipedia article came from a specific source, say a still shot from a YouTube video originally posted by a specific user, what is wrong with crediting that image as courtesy of the person who originally made the image available (through a video)?
Thanks,
RHKlein 02:08, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
No, you are not mediator of a case... To be a mediator of a case, a true mediator has to be accepted by all sides. You appointed yourself a mediator and are trying to claim that your decision can somehow overrule policy and consensus. That's not how Wikipedia works. Also, from past experience, in order for a mediation case to be open all sides EXPLICITLY have to agree to it. You never asked me to agree, you just started it up. Again, that's not Wikipedia works. DreamGuy 19:31, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
MedCab
[edit]the issue seems to stem from things like the declaration that 'this is not up for discussion' when making edits and such. I suspect he's decided what the answers are and doesn't need mediation because he knows best. I don't think he realizes that the issue is NOT really his edits, but is WP:OWN issues and confrontational attitude; he's angering people and stating his edits declaratively (a Wikia wiki is *not* competition). Serious WP:TIGER at times. Anyway, I don't think it's personal against you, though now that he's lashed out at you you're probably out of the playing field for this one. --Thespian 22:16, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, that's not it at all. Just following clear rules that were built with a firm consensus of editors over the objections of a small number of editors who want to ignore them for no reason. DreamGuy 01:00, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'd rather that the discussion was continued elsewhere, on your or your talkpages. Cool Bluetalk to me 01:04, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- Absolutely. I just wanted to let you know that I didn't think it was you; anyone would have gotten that snark; your comment on my talk page just seemed to indicate you thought he had a problem with *you* being mediator, and I don't think that's the case. Thanks for your efforts, hope future mediations go better for you ;-) --Thespian 18:32, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- And I just thought I should make clear that this guy's opinions are wrong. You didn't follow mediation policy, so I called you on it. Someone who had followed policy wouldn't have had to have been chastised for it. Not that I would have accepted mediation anyway, but telling you you need to follow policy was and is something that you could have avoided if you had bothered to read the very rules you volunteered yourself to try to enforce. DreamGuy 20:28, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- Absolutely. I just wanted to let you know that I didn't think it was you; anyone would have gotten that snark; your comment on my talk page just seemed to indicate you thought he had a problem with *you* being mediator, and I don't think that's the case. Thanks for your efforts, hope future mediations go better for you ;-) --Thespian 18:32, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'd rather that the discussion was continued elsewhere, on your or your talkpages. Cool Bluetalk to me 01:04, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- in re another Medcab case
Question for you on User talk:Athaenara#MedCab. — Athaenara ✉ 19:55, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- You asked me to provide a statement. I've provided two, which you are welcome to copy to the project page where you see fit. — Athaenara ✉ 20:06, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
WP:BEANS
[edit]That's a very clever idea. Mdotley 00:21, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- I followed this just because it was right there, and I have to say, the line "Prophylactic admonition may trigger novel mischief." sounds like it should be in a fortune cookie, and it amuses me a tonne. --Thespian 18:36, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- I didn't write WP:BEANS or that line, just this little subpage. Cool Bluetalk to me 19:17, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- I followed this just because it was right there, and I have to say, the line "Prophylactic admonition may trigger novel mischief." sounds like it should be in a fortune cookie, and it amuses me a tonne. --Thespian 18:36, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]For the moment, my reply is in this diff but I hope to add more soon. Please be patient and thank you. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 16:18, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Why am I going to be banned?
[edit]Hi, I spend hours working on the articles of Sim Street and Sim Brother and I wondering why I am going to get blocked for posting images from a site which I own... there is nothing inapporite about the images whats so ever.
Image Copyrighting
[edit]I saw the conversation you just had with the member above - and I am also confused about copywriting. The images uploaded are from a website/forum where we post and have permission to upload the images (some of which are our own.) What would be a suitable copyright tag to use under these circumstances?
Thanks In Advance, Jamster_4
my RFA
[edit]Thank you for supporting my RFA. I hope I will live up to your expectation. Let me know if you need any help, or I make any mistake. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 23:58, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 18th, 2007.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 25 | 18 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:26, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Untagged images
[edit]Hello. I've noticed recently on several occasions that you have been marking images with {{untagged}}, but have not been specifying the date parameters. This causes the image to be categorized into Category:Images with no copyright tag as of unknown date 2007 (which does not exist), rather than one of the child categories of Category:Images with unknown copyright status. You might want to consider adding the parameters (example: {{untagged|month=June|day=12|year=2007}} ) or, even easier, use {{subst:nld}} as suggested at Template:Untagged. --After Midnight 0001 20:22, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for dropping by to respond. I hope it works out for you. --After Midnight 0001 00:37, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Thank you X 100
[edit] No more H[edit]Did you see this? I've commented the drastic change in the situation over at the mediation page. Peter Isotalo 11:33, 24 June 2007 (UTC) Active NBA players Who have Won a Championship[edit]You listed Active NBA Players Who Have Won A Championship as prod, I agree with your assesment,; however I believe it should go through discusion first please contribute and explain your reasoning at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Active NBA Players Who Have Won A Championship I don't see any problems that the user added. The only thing that the user forgot to do is add reference and add page links. OhanaUnitedTalk page 07:13, 26 June 2007 (UTC) Signpost updated for June 25th, 2007.[edit]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:26, 26 June 2007 (UTC) RE: Italiavivi's falsified charge of sock puppetry[edit]Yesterday to my surprise I saw that there is a whole controversy about me. I was not informed about this at all. I would wish to have the sock puppet page removed. Below is what I posted at the sock puppet page about me: The two accounts were in full and independent operation since before the Miriam Shear conflict even started. Thus the accusation based as it is on Yisraeldov being a replacement for Yisraelasper is groundless. Yisraelasper The Mehadrin bus line was not my cause. You are making canards. The Miriam Shear story I contributed to but it also was not my only one on Wikipedia. Also you continually censored out what I added on the Miriam Shear story. I have no account other one. Worry about your own cases of being blocked and condemned by people rather than starting up again with me. I am not identical with any other user other than myselfself. It so happens my full name includes the name Dov as my second name but I have no other Wikipedia account other than Yisraelasper. If you continue to make trouble I will urge you be banned again as you hinder rather than help. Yisraelasper Italiavivi I contributed to more than just one article. You claim above that I was a one agenda user and yet you fail to say that my last post on May 2 was on something else a topic I returned to yet. I posted on May 2 "Talk:Extrasolar moon (The Petition no longer exists)." I am not identical to Yisraeldov. I also don't live in Israel. I don't have an agenda for separate bus seating. I don't feel there is a need for separate bus seating. The Miriam Shear dispute has been over for months. You kept on though reposting warnings on my user page including on June 12 the date of your posting above after not posting on my site for at least over a month if not longer. No one asked you to. I am going to complain about this attack on me to Wikipedia to have this page removed or otherwise have you banned. What kind of a system is this where the evidence is not reviewed? Anyone with an agenda like Italiavivi can defame someone and that someone is not informed of the charges to be able to make a defense?User:Yisraelasper Italiavivi I didn't know until now that there was an Egged article. You just make accusations and this you submit as evidence! Yisraelasper Italiavivi you say that Yisraeldov started contributing in 2007? He was around in June 2006* and I've seen now that the first of his many contributions as far back as I was able to see started in July 2006**. All this was before even the Miriam Shear controversy. How could he be sock puppet for what wasn't yet?
Hello, Yisraeldov, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Mak (talk) 05:43, 18 June 2006 (UTC) Your view of RZ is verry limited. Yes there is a MO comunity in Israel, and yes most of them tend to be RZ, but those are not the only or even the majority of Religious Zionists here. --yisraeldov 19:23, 21 June 2006 (UTC)" Yisraelasper You were supposed to notify me of the charge "Notify the suspected puppetmaster." Instead you just reposted on June 12th 2007 old Miriam Shear article warnings though no one asked you too. Yisraelasper
RE: Medcab (List of Mario series enemies)[edit]If you are wondering all I did was suggest that they goto RFC or Medcab about the merge disagreement. I doubt that really makes me an "involved party". FunPika 21:54, 27 June 2007 (UTC) I'm in for the Mario enemy thing, but I'll warn you, I'm not 100% in favour of either party's viewpoint (Fryguy64 23:31, 27 June 2007 (UTC)) I don't mind, but don't expect me to be very active in it. --Powerlord 21:21, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:CCDS Logo4.JPG)[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:CCDS Logo4.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:29, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Kentucky FA Status?[edit]Has there been any word on the status of Kentucky's nom to FA? If there is any work I can do, let me know. I've got other projects on my plate as well, but I can do somethings on some time periods and others on other time periods. -- Steven Williamson (HiB2Bornot2B) - talk 13:07, 29 June 2007 (UTC) Incorrect use of PROD[edit]Hey I don't think you used PROD correctly. Also, if what you say about original research should stand, a majority of Wikipedia articles should be deleted simply b/c they're stubs. (Wikimachine 14:39, 2 July 2007 (UTC))
Medcab - Twelve Monkeys[edit]Hi - I have no objections to you being our mediator:)Breed3011 18:07, 2 July 2007 (UTC) Yes, it's alright if you mediate the case. Indecine 18:38, 2 July 2007 (UTC) One of the users, Breed3011, has apparently decided not to wait for mediation and has put all of the original material back in along with a lot of new but similar material. I am considering requesting arbitration. What would you recommend? Indecine 08:27, 4 July 2007 (UTC) Signpost updated for July 2nd, 2007.[edit]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:32, 3 July 2007 (UTC) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
){kind=link}