User talk:CoolChib124

Notice

Hey guys, I has been blocked by a Wikipedia Admin permanently, so that's means I cannot edit Wikipedia articles anymore, my career from February 2021 to April 11 2022 is over. The reason I was blocked was because someone removed an image in MH17 then I have to put it back so other people when reading can know that 9M-MRD was also painted in the Heliconia livery, however another person keep reverting the edit I made, which made the Admin thought I started, I was still able to calm down. Dear Black Kite, please don't take away my hobby, editing Wikipedia is my only hobby, I hope you will understand this misunderstanding and unblock me from editing Wikipedia. I will not leave my account here but I will continue reading articles in Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CoolChib124 (talk • contribs) 21:36, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@CoolChib124: if you wish to request an unblocking, use {{unblock}}. 晚安 (トークページ) 12:40, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CoolChib124 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

not my fault when someone started

Decline reason:

Your actions absolutely, categorically are your fault (and your responsibility). Yamla (talk) 12:48, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have removed your three unblock requests. Please stop. Read WP:GAB. Do not make another unblock request until you thoroughly understand WP:GAB. If you continue as you have been, you are likely to lose access to your talk page. So, again, stop, then read WP:GAB. Your unblock request should address only your actions, because only your actions are relevant to your unblock request. Only your actions. And stop making duplicate (and empty) unblock requests. One open unblock request at a time, please. --Yamla (talk) 13:03, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this edit is the best you can come up with after reading and thoroughly understanding WP:GAB, you are either trolling or lack sufficient competence to edit Wikipedia. Be warned, you'll probably get no more than one more chance to write an appropriate unblock request. I very strongly suggest you make it count. --Yamla (talk) 13:19, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please, I really wanna edit Wikipedia again, I told you it's the admin fault, he literally block me from editing instead of the the person. CoolChib124 (talk) 13:24, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I want to be very, very, very clear here. So listen. It is your fault. Nobody else's. Your fault. Yours. You are to blame. You and you alone. If you read WP:GAB and believed it was appropriate to blame others, this is clear evidence that you need to remain blocked. I will not respond further. --Yamla (talk) 14:39, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You freaking bastard, why did even Wikimedia Studios hired you as admin, you deserve to get fired with User:Black Kite CoolChib124 (talk) 14:44, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That is exactly not the response. I was genuinely hoping you would see some semblance of rationality, but clearly you need to take some time away from Wikipedia. I have disabled your talk page access, so any future unblock requests will need to take place via WP:UTRS. Please do not abuse it and get blocked from that avenue as well. Genuinely, take some time off and think about what you actually want to get out of a Wikipedia experience. Primefac (talk) 18:00, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #57952

is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:51, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #58367

is closed. UTRS banned six months. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:03, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #68739

Based on their request, I have reinstated talk page access so they can make their unblock request here. Checkuser data shows no evidence of block evasion. -- Yamla (talk) 11:13, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla thank you a lot, god bless you CoolChib124 (talk) 11:59, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

5th Block appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

CoolChib124 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I take back my threat to Wikipedia editors. I will not do it again, I was still young when the block was made, so I know nothing back then.

Accept reason:

I have unblocked. Welcome back. PhilKnight (talk) 13:19, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

THANK YOU BRO CoolChib124 (talk) 13:34, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CoolChib124 (talk) 13:08, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What subject areas do you want to edit, if unblocked? PhilKnight (talk) 14:38, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would said in Aviation, because am an Aviation geek (also stylised as Avgeek). CoolChib124 (talk) 14:47, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Black Kite: - how do you feel about an unblock? PhilKnight (talk) 14:52, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate the second chance I have, and edit Wikipedia better. CoolChib124 (talk) 14:54, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think Black Kite missed the ping, so I have asked him on his talk page. PhilKnight (talk) 06:30, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@PhilKnight okay thanks a lot CoolChib124 (talk) 06:31, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@PhilKnight: - fine by me as it appears that the user has understood the problems. Black Kite (talk) 11:49, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Black Kite Oh my god, thank you. Black kite! CoolChib124 (talk) 11:54, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly advice

I see you have created an RfA page for yourself, made in your second edit post-unblock. Unfortunately, it has zero chances of success at this point in time. Please read Wikipedia:Advice for RfA candidates – it typically takes numerous content contributions to the encyclopedia, thousands of substantive edits, a clean recent block log, and a strong foundation of community trust, for a candidate to be successful. Attempting an RfA now will almost certainly result in strong backlash from other editors and will end in disappointment for you. I recommend placing {{db-g7}} on the page to request its deletion until you are more prepared at a future time. DanCherek (talk) 18:11, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. I shouldn't have created the page, because I may be inactive for very long time (because of school), so maybe I think again whether to be an admin or not in the future. Thank you for the advice. CoolChib124 (talk) 01:49, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]