Jump to content

User talk:Cookingexpert

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 13:44, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Cookingexpert (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
89.240.86.202 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Chris19910". The reason given for Chris19910's block is: "disruptive editing on RC patrolling application pages".


Decline reason: Obvious sockpuppetry. The block on your main account has now been extended to two weeks. --  Netsnipe   ►  17:11, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cookingexpert (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I will give you sockpuppetry. I will see what you think when your admin access is removed and you are blocked for false accusations!

Decline reason:

Sounds like very substantiated accusations for me. — -- lucasbfr talk 18:09, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cookingexpert (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am a steward on meta but cant unblock myself anyone going to unblock me? Or do I have to remove it myself.

Decline reason:

I AM a steward on Meta, declined. Don't try to file stupid unblock requests, or this page will be protected. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 18:40, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Then by all means explain why your name doesn't appear at meta:Special:ListUsers/steward. Outright lies like this are grounds for an indefinite ban. --  Netsnipe   ►  18:27, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest soap to wash his mouth. -- lucasbfr talk 18:40, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cookingexpert (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

User:Pathoschild is my user id if you would like to go and check it out.

Decline reason:

If you can tell me what the content of his last email to the mailing list he and I are active on was, I'll unblock you. Daniel 10:56, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.