User talk:Continueddonations

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy, by sockpuppetry. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. . You may not use additional accounts to evade a block, you have been indefinitely blocked from editing by a member of the arbiration committee, and that means, I'm afraid, that you are not welcome here. Unreformable tendentious editors tend to have a short and troubled life on Wikipedia. Guy 22:25, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is plain dumb. I could easily evade the block by using a different ID - what you call 'sockpuppetry' (another silly, dehumanising expression comparable to 'troll*,' IMHO), and avoid controversial topics for a while (and who's to say I haven't?) => the whole Wiki arbitration committee is suspect, because the 'sockpuppet' technique could, in theory, be what is behind the Administration. One person, such as the founder, Jimbo Wales, could have multiple IDs and repeatedly reelect himself over and over. It would explain, for example, why different admins all fail the IQ test of working out what's been going on in recent disputes, and all see it the same way (altho I accept that the alternative explanation, of standard, 'PC' reactionary mindsets all working in unison, is just as likely).

My guess as to your next move: blocking me even here to suppress the truth. Come back to me when you can spell 'arbitration.' Continueddonations 23:37, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Which is also, in point of fact, racist (see relevant Talk page).

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Continueddonations (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

tendentious blocking

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry is not tolerated. -- Netsnipe ► 05:12, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

'Sockpuppetry,' as you so charmingly choose to call it, is better than all the libellous, defamatory, POV editing, administration and arbitration it set out to resist. You don't tolerate 'sockpuppetry,' maybe, but I won't tolerate illegal defamation and libel by Wikipedia, either. Continueddonations 23:28, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]