User talk:Contextualise

Concern regarding User:Contextualise/sandbox/Alice Blue

Hello, Contextualise. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Contextualise/sandbox/Alice Blue, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Contextualise/sandbox/Alice Blue

Hello, Contextualise. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox/Alice Blue".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:43, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alice Blue Private Ltd (July 20)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Onmyway22 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Onmyway22 talk 10:15, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Contextualise! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onmyway22 talk 10:15, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Alice Blue Private Ltd

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Alice Blue Private Ltd, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onmyway22 talk 10:15, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alice Blue (company) (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alice Blue (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 12:50, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hello Contextualise. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Contextualise. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Contextualise|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. bonadea contributions talk 12:51, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 10:17, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another account?

Hi Contextualise, what is your connection to the user Savitha5267? Their sandbox is very similar indeed to the draft you created in your own sandbox (which I moved to Draft:Alice Blue (company). --bonadea contributions talk 12:55, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bondea, Savitha5267 was merely helping me generate additional content for the page I have been trying to create unsuccessfully for a while now. I here by give an undertaking that this is not a paid exercise and I am not receiving any compensation for this effort. Plz guide me how to take this forward. Contextualise (talk) 10:38, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but it is not just Savitha5267 – there's also Sanket2504 who copied the rejected draft and pasted it into article space as Alice Blue Financial Services (now at Draft:Alice Blue Financial Services), and Swathi4352 who created a very promotional sandbox draft about Sidhavelayutham Mohan, which Sanket2504 also copied and pasted into a sandbox and then at Draft:Sidhavelayutham Mohan (deleted as spam). Four accounts (including yours) creating almost identical promotional pages about Alice Blue and its founder within the span of a week in November last year is surely not coincidental.

What made you decide to create articles about this company, and how come you have been so persistent? You have created three drafts about that single obscure company, at regular intervals since November 2021. Why? --bonadea contributions talk 20:53, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey we are just a bunch of friends trying to create a page for a company that we know. we are not employed or otherwise engaged with them financially. I would have preferred to be the person to create a page for them but you know friends. Its a company that used to be in the neighbourhood hence we decided to create a page for them. Would request your help to guide me in this process.

This asked can I also request how to edit an article that is locked. Contextualise (talk) 15:41, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Alice Blue (company) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alice Blue (company). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:27, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:25, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alice Blue (company) (November 16)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Entirely promotional, and obvious UPE, in addition to the lack of notability.

bonadea contributions talk 10:08, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing.

Please also respond to the question in the section "Another account?" above. bonadea contributions talk 08:12, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

aliceblueonline.com: Linksearch en - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • MER-C Cross-wiki • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced • COIBot-Local - COIBot-XWiki - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.org • Live link: http://www.aliceblueonline.com