User talk:Consumers

October 2019

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 23:17, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Consumers (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, first the choice of my username is simply Consumers that not refer a company or a brand, it refers a consumer in general, I read the investigation and consult history edits, and I never made these same target edits to promote fake relaunch or something like that, and I don’t understand the mention to reach extended confirmed user, ECU made me able to edit on Donald Trump for example, which I don’t see any link with the investigation. Anyone can edit on any articles to ameliorate the encyclopedia, so I wait an unblock, see you soon Ivanvector and have a good day.

Decline reason:

Then I'm sure you have a good explanation why your account just happens to be technically indistinguishable from all the others mentioned in the investigation you read, including User:Distributing. Huon (talk) 18:24, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Consumers (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi Huon, I don’t understand the decline and the mention of an other account not affiliated with me named Distributing.

Decline reason:

We have established your statement is false. Yamla (talk) 18:44, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This account is blocked for sockpuppetry, as documented (and confirmed with technical evidence) at WP:Sockpuppet investigations/ConsumersDistributingonline/Archive. You will find that other account mentioned there, among others. Huon (talk) 18:41, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Consumers (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

All this investigation is not me, I have no more to say.

Decline reason:

Well then, I guess we're done here. Talkpage access revoked. Yunshui ^雲 _水 21:40, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are welcome to take this approach. It will result in losing access to your talk page, as we have established the sockpuppetry. --Yamla (talk) 20:38, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]