User talk:Consider using a other than your real name
Consider using a other than your real name (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have only made constructive edits to pages (Davros,Lex Luger) despite bullying I have received. "Clearly not being here to build an encyclopedia" even though I fixed the Davros article using the episode's lines about what the Doctor's mission was. But no apparently this admin knows my life better then me with out even asking me. Well I've not made one vandalism edit to a page so you cannot block me because I've not done anything wrong. I edited correctly on Davros so legally I am a correct editor. If you block me when I haven't vandalised you're sending a clear message you don't want LGBT users who stand up and edit correctly. (you cannot say I have vandalised a page when I have not and that is the only reason you can get blocked on here) I have only edited pages with good intend even if I was wrong I didn't blank a page or say cunt or something. No I edited what I thought was with in the rules so I shouldn't be blocked it is a travesty of justice and when I find out how to appeal this I will and I will never stop untiil this unjust ban is removed from my character. I only edited pages with good faith no vandalism. Can you point to when I vandalised a page? I don't know why I'm blocked why not say look x is bad don't do that. Or cos I'm gay? That's honestly the only reason I can fathom when I correctly edited a page. Ths ban is inhumane unjust and I will fight this. I want to file a formal complaint. I have been accused of not joining to build an encyclopedia with no chance to defend myself. More bullying I am accused of editing talk pages or something? With no way to defend my self! I editd ONE person's talk page once they replied that was that. "Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Wrugtrab (talk) 19:48, 29 March 2022 (UTC)" Could someone explain what I'm being accused of and how I can defend myself from this attack when I can't edit that page to defend myself? just an abuse of power. Consider using a other than your real name I didn't even break a rule! and if I did not one that gets perma ban right away! (talk) 18:49, Why are you doing this to me 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Trolling. Talk page access removed to prevent timesink. Floquenbeam (talk) 20:05, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Notice of noticeboard discussion
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Wrugtrab (talk) 19:48, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
- I have not edited anyone's talk except one person I left one comment and they replied and that was it I am constantly accused here.
- You're avoided vandalism and disruptive editing. The Wikipedia administrators' noticeborad has been requested to Talk Page Access and involved. Wrugtrab (talk) 19:56, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
- I have not done any vandalism or disruptive editing of any kind. All I am doing is working on my appeal and it say I can add to it at anytime. I am not breaking a rule if it says I can add to my appeal at anytime.
- As good faith I'll take everything else off the page to show I am not abusing the system
is closed. User is UTRS banned. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:37, 1 April 2022 (UTC)