User talk:Conor MacCloed
May 2021: Potential article about the NICE
[edit]I'd like to help a little in getting the NICE into Wikipedia. It might possibly be shoehorned into African easterly jet. Or, it could be a small section in Climate change. Or it could be an article.
The greatest stumbling-block will be finding reliable, published, in-depth sources to cite (this demonstrates "notability"). What secondary or tertiary sources exist which talk about the NICE? For an article, two or three good sources are the minimum. Fewer are needed for a section or a paragraph in another article. Can you list any here?--Quisqualis (talk) 02:33, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Moppatt O'Smitty (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Missvain (talk) 00:00, 28 May 2021 (UTC) |
May 28 2021: Potential article about the NICE
[edit]All help with the NiCE stuff is greatfully accepted. It is essential research like penicillin, smallpox, cholera: it has to be done, but I have a significant skills shortage in media. The problem is the barriers emplaced from letting the NiCE stuff into the public realm. Go to youtube "Nile Climate Engine" - the NiCE Stuff. That video gives a broad view.
African Easterly Waves is better then African Jet. Avoid 'climate change' as a genre, it is an unofficial banner of anti emissions and it is populated by vigorous but misinformed zealots.
Your question: Can you list any here? Question to the EU parliament by S Agenww MEP. Submission to UK E&CC select committee AR% review. Rebuttal to flawed evidence to US congressional oversight comittee 2019 Presentation to both AMS 101 cmeeting and 2018 Porto conference Exemplified by editors of BAMS in their 'front page' publication.
email me direct so that we can converse easily: mcmenemieconor@hotmail.comConor MacCloed (talk) 10:39, 28 May 2021 (UTC)