User talk:Connor401

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Connor401 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

HUH?!?!?!?! What is this block about? I have not vandalized any pages.

Decline reason:

You used multiple accounts. — MBisanz ^talk 00:37, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What are you talking about? I have never vandalized and i do not have multiple accounts. All my contributions are constructive. Consider further explaining. --Connor401 (talk) 00:40, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've been blocked by a user with checkuser access, I assume she would not have blocked you without compelling evidence. –xenocidic (talk) 01:06, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I assume she has looked at something incorrectly or jumped to conclusions without further investigation of edit history. She didn't even care to be so nice as to explain her reasoning or even which account she believes is the sock puppet. Because I am blocked, I cannot contact her to ask her. --Connor401 (talk) 01:13, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock declined

Hi there. I rechecked your account, and I'm absolutely not going to unblock at this time. You've used multiple accounts for vandalism and furthermore, you've been constantly logging out to vandalise. Over multiple, very distinct IPs, and the technical evidence is particularly strong. Nice try, but no unblock - Alison ^❤ 04:53, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here's your sock account; Billygoat123 (talk · contribs). I don't find racist vandalism to be particularly funny[1] and I've not even mentioned the many IP addresses you've vandalised with - Alison ^❤ 04:57, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And the wannabe-Grawp edits? Lame in the extreme - Alison ^❤ 05:00, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am NOT Billygoat123. I looked at his contributions and he appears to have been inactive for over a year. I do not vandalize and I even revert vandalism with m:wikimonitor whenever I see it. My IP changes normally when my modem (DSL) resets and when I travel. My ISP uses shared IP addresses I created an account due to this. I frequently delete my history and cookies and therefor must re-log in. All my contributions are constructive. I enjoy contributing free media whenever is see it needed. Those vandalism edits are not mine. Thanks --Connor401 (talk) 14:43, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've been at this for absolutely ages, and over a wide number of IPs. Seriously - your good-hand account has now been caught. Your IP address changes radically and the same racist vandal follows every where you go. Exact same style, same IP, same useragent, etc - Alison ^❤ 16:50, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]