User talk:ConfusedEnoch
Welcome!
[edit]Hi ConfusedEnoch! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Ian.thomson (talk) 09:11, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
A summary of some important site policies and guidelines
[edit]- Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. All we do here is cite, summarize, and paraphrase professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources, without addition, nor commentary.
- "Truth" is not the only criteria for inclusion, verifiability is also required.
- Always cite a source for any new information. When adding this information to articles, use <ref>reference tags like this</ref>, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
- We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote any ideology. We cannot combine two sources to arrive at a statement not explicitly supported by either source.
- Primary sources are usually avoided to prevent original research. Secondary or tertiary sources are preferred for this reason as well. This includes religious texts such as the Bible, Quran, Vedas; and (under many circumstances) older commentaries such as the Early Church Fathers or the Hadith.
- Reliable sources typically include: articles from mainstream magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
- Wikipedia is not a source for Wikipedia. This is intentional.
- Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for.
Ian.thomson (talk) 09:11, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- You normally don't edit your own comments after they've been responded to (or other peoples, hence my earlier screw up in this message). Since it was a couple of spelling fixes and no real change in meaning, I don't mind, but some users will really get on you for that. Ian.thomson (talk) 10:38, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for the heads up and the detailed explanations. I'm starting to understand (and appreciate) the way Wikipedia works and I'm trying my best not to edit any pages if I feel like the information provided doesn't adhere to the website's rules.
I have a quick question, are there any specific rules for the Talk section (other than not editing your replied-to comments)? And if there are some, is there some place to discuss/share some ideas that would otherwise be considered original research or primary source interpretation? ConfusedEnoch (talk) 12:18, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Talk pages are really just for direct article improvement and not a general discussion forum. The bulletpoints I left come from a much larger guide I wrote, which also includes:
- Please sign your posts on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~, found next to the 1 key), and please do not change others' comments. New comments go at the bottom, under the comments they are responding to.
- Assume as best as you can that other editors are here to help. (You're doing a really good job with that and not enough people do -- thanks!).
- Ian.thomson (talk) 22:15, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Age of the Great Sphinx
[edit]The problem is that the article doesn't draw on Sphinx water erosion hypothesis which shows that most geologists who have studied it disagree with it. In fact its main supporters, Robert Schoch and Colin Reader, aren't academic geologists, Schoch teaching general science in a non-degree college and Reader being a local authority geologist. Doug Weller talk 07:34, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Wow, I didn't know that about them, thanks for clarifying.
Robert Schoch does have both an MS and PhD in Geology from Yale, though, so I don't think it's fair to say he's not an academic geologist.ConfusedEnoch (talk) 09:50, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Cn tags
[edit]{{cn}} - curly brackets. Doug Weller talk 15:01, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Thank you! @Doug Weller ConfusedEnoch (talk) 19:15, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
October 2020
[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Secularism in Lebanon into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI! 15:46, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Remphan
[edit]Hi, I'm working to improve Remphan and I saw you had made a number of edits there so might be interested in following and contributing further on the subject. WeDoSome (talk) 18:46, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |